Carbon accounting for negative emissions technologies

@article{Brander2021CarbonAF,
  title={Carbon accounting for negative emissions technologies},
  author={Matthew Brander and Francisco Ascui and Vivian Scott and Simon F. B. Tett},
  journal={Climate Policy},
  year={2021},
  volume={21},
  pages={699 - 717}
}
ABSTRACT Negative emissions technologies (NETs) are an essential part of most scenarios for achieving the Paris Agreement goal of limiting warming to below 2°C and for all scenarios that limit warming to 1.5 °C. The deployment of these technologies requires carbon accounting methods for a range of different purposes, such as determining the effectiveness of specific technologies or incentivising NETs. Although the need for carbon accounting methods is discussed within the literature on NETs… 
Assessing the carbon capture potential of a reforestation project
TLDR
The results show major errors in carbon accounting in reforestation projects if they ignore the time needed for trees to reach their carbon capture potential; ignore the GHG emissions involved in setting up a plot; or under-estimate tree losses due to inevitable human and climatic disturbances.
CO2 removal and 1.5{\deg}C: what, when, where, and how?
The international community aims to limit global warming to 1.5◦C, but little progress has been made towards a global, cost-efficient, and fair climate mitigation plan to deploy carbon dioxide
Carbon Removal Using Coastal Blue Carbon Ecosystems Is Uncertain and Unreliable, With Questionable Climatic Cost-Effectiveness
Mangrove forests, seagrass meadows and tidal saltmarshes are vegetated coastal ecosystems that accumulate and store large quantities of carbon in their sediments. Many recent studies and reviews have
A generalizable framework for spatially explicit exploration of soil organic carbon sequestration on global marginal land
Land-based CO2 removal demands changes in management or new suitable areas to sustainably grow additional biomass without reducing food supply or damaging natural ecosystems. The soil organic carbon
Bioenergy with or without carbon dioxide removal: influence of functional unit choice and parameter variability
PURPOSE. Bioenergy with carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly presented as an efficient way to mitigate climate change. This study set out to determine under which circumstances and
Carbon Accounting for Enhanced Weathering
The inevitable deployment of negative emission technologies requires carbon accounting to incentivise the investment and to foster an active CO2 certificate trading schema. Enhanced Weathering as one
Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) poses a significant and complex public policy challenge in the long-term. Presently treated as a marginal aspect of climate policy, addressing CDR as a public good is
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 114 REFERENCES
What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations
ABSTRACT A cumulative emissions approach is increasingly used to inform mitigation policy. However, there are different interpretations of what ‘2°C’ implies. Here it is argued that cost-optimization
Chapter 14. Negative Emissions Technologies
The Paris Agreement signalled global consensus to keep average temperature rise “well below” 2 °C by the end of the century. Results from integrated assessment models have made it increasingly
(Mis)conceptions about modeling of negative emissions technologies
Intentionally removing carbon from the atmosphere with negative emission technologies (NETs) will be important to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century and to limit global warming to 2 °C or even
Zero, one, or in between: evaluation of alternative national and entity‐level accounting for bioenergy
Accounting for bioenergy's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, as done under the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme, fails to capture the full extent of these emissions.
Challenges to the use of BECCS as a keystone technology in pursuit of 1.5⁰C
Non-technical summary Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is represented in many integrated assessment models as a keystone technology in delivering the Paris Agreement on climate
Negative Emissions: Priorities for Research and Policy Design
The large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is likely to be important in maintaining temperature rise “well below” 2oC, and vital in achieving the most stringent 1.5oC target.
The potential for implementation of Negative Emission Technologies in Scotland
Research priorities for negative emissions
Carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere (CDR)—also known as ‘negative emissions’—features prominently in most 2 °C scenarios and has been under increased scrutiny by scientists, citizens, and
Beyond “Net-Zero”: A Case for Separate Targets for Emissions Reduction and Negative Emissions
• Targets and accounting for negative emissions should be explicitly set and managed separately from existing and future targets for emissions reduction. • Failure to make such a separation has
...
...