Can the behavioral sciences self-correct? A social epistemic study.

  • Felipe Romero
  • Published 2016 in Studies in history and philosophy of science


Advocates of the self-corrective thesis argue that scientific method will refute false theories and find closer approximations to the truth in the long run. I discuss a contemporary interpretation of this thesis in terms of frequentist statistics in the context of the behavioral sciences. First, I identify experimental replications and systematic aggregation of evidence (meta-analysis) as the self-corrective mechanism. Then, I present a computer simulation study of scientific communities that implement this mechanism to argue that frequentist statistics may converge upon a correct estimate or not depending on the social structure of the community that uses it. Based on this study, I argue that methodological explanations of the "replicability crisis" in psychology are limited and propose an alternative explanation in terms of biases. Finally, I conclude suggesting that scientific self-correction should be understood as an interaction effect between inference methods and social structures.

DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.10.002

11 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@article{Romero2016CanTB, title={Can the behavioral sciences self-correct? A social epistemic study.}, author={Felipe Romero}, journal={Studies in history and philosophy of science}, year={2016}, volume={60}, pages={55-69} }