Can the Public Express Their Views or Say No Through Public Engagement?

@article{Evans2020CanTP,
  title={Can the Public Express Their Views or Say No Through Public Engagement?},
  author={John H. Evans},
  journal={Environmental Communication},
  year={2020},
  volume={14},
  pages={881 - 885}
}
  • John H. Evans
  • Published 3 September 2020
  • Political Science, History
  • Environmental Communication
New technologies often come with calls for public engagement, which presumably brings the views of the public to decision-makers, and the CRISPR genetic modification revolution has led to such call... 

Societal Debates About Emerging Genetic Technologies: Toward a Science of Public Engagement

ABSTRACT Gene editing is an inherently wicked problem with no single right answer and no group uniquely positioned to decide this answer. We discuss the intricacies of the debates surrounding both

What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond

TLDR
This work systematize common goals, principles, and modalities of public engagement on CRISPR and other emerging technologies, and evaluates empirically the likely successes of various modalities.

Indigenous Publicity in American Public Lands Controversies: Environmental Participation in the Fight for Bears Ears National Monument

Environmental decision-making scholars have attended closely to the role of publics and counterpublics in environmental controversies. However, this body of work has undertheorized the ways that

Thirty years of science–society interfaces: What’s next?

  • D. Scheufele
  • Political Science
    Public understanding of science
  • 2022
Looking back over three decades of work on public understanding (and communication) of science, I revisit four areas in which our field has been unnecessarily stagnant, but that also provide exciting

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

Introduction to Human Flourishing in an Age of Gene Editing

In 2015, in the journal Science, a highly regarded group of scientists, science policy experts, and ethicists called for a public conversation about the ethical questions raised by a new technology

Public engagement and communication: who is in charge?

TLDR
An open letter was addressed to the Parties to the 13th meeting on the Convention on Biological Diversity in December 2016 in Mexico and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, requesting support on gene drive research, and about 80 scientists, most of whom are involved in insect research and malaria control, have signed this open letter.

Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus

1: The challenge of consensus for bioethics. 2: Consensus in bioethics: Problems and prospects. 3: Analyzing consensus. 4: Liberalism and the moral authorty of consensus. 5: National ethics

Principles of biomedical ethics

TLDR
The principles of biomedical and Islamic medical ethics and an interfaith perspective on end-of-life issues and three cases to exemplify some of the conflicts in ethical decision-making are discussed.

Finding a Forum for Bioethics in U.S. Public Policy

TLDR
It is concluded that reconstitution of an Ethics Advisory Board within the Department of Health and Human Services and the formation of a President's Bioethics Commission are needed as the nation confronts new and difficult choices in research ethics and the delivery of health care.

Looking back at the President's Commission.

  • A. Capron
  • Political Science
    The Hastings Center report
  • 1983
Capron, former executive director of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, reviews the work of the Commission and

The birth of bioethics.

  • A. Jonsen
  • Medicine
    The Hastings Center report
  • 1993
TLDR
On 23-24 September 1992, "The Birth of Bioethics," held at the University of Washington, Seattle, gathered many of the "pioneers" of the new ethics of medicine to review its history and project its future.

Human gene therapy: ethics and public policy.

The first three human gene transfer/therapy clinical protocols are now underway after having been subjected to an extensive review process by the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) and its