Can You Tell the Difference Between DL-Lite Ontologies?

Abstract

We develop a formal framework for comparing different versions of DL-Lite ontologies. Four notions of difference and entailment between ontologies are introduced and their applications in ontology development and maintenance discussed. These notions are obtained by distinguishing between differences that can be observed among concept inclusions, answers to queries over ABoxes, and by taking into account additional context ontologies. We compare these notions, study their meta-properties, and determine the computational complexity of the corresponding reasoning tasks. Moreover, we show that checking difference and entailment can be automated by means of encoding into QBF satisfiability and using off-the-shelf QBF solvers. Finally, we explore the relationship between the notion of forgetting (or uniform interpolation) and our notions of difference between ontologies.

Extracted Key Phrases

1 Figure or Table

02040200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

121 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 121 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Kontchakov2008CanYT, title={Can You Tell the Difference Between DL-Lite Ontologies?}, author={Roman Kontchakov and Frank Wolter and Michael Zakharyaschev}, booktitle={KR}, year={2008} }