Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality

@article{Guglielmo2010CanUS,
  title={Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality},
  author={Steve Guglielmo and B. Malle},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2010},
  volume={36},
  pages={1635 - 1647}
}
Can an event’s blameworthiness distort whether people see it as intentional? In controversial recent studies, people judged a behavior’s negative side effect intentional even though the agent allegedly had no desire for it to occur. Such a judgment contradicts the standard assumption that desire is a necessary condition of intentionality, and it raises concerns about assessments of intentionality in legal settings. Six studies examined whether blameworthy events distort intentionality judgments… Expand
Motive-matching: Perceptions of intentionality for coerced action
Understanding Side-Effect Intentionality Asymmetries: Meaning, Morality, or Attitudes and Defaults?
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 63 REFERENCES
Asymmetries in Judgments of Responsibility and Intentional Action
Acting Intentionally and the Side-Effect Effect
Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect
The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment
Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation
...
1
2
3
4
5
...