Can Stereotype Threat Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics Performance and Achievement?

@article{Stoet2012CanST,
  title={Can Stereotype Threat Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics Performance and Achievement?},
  author={G. Stoet and D. Geary},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  year={2012},
  volume={16},
  pages={102 - 93}
}
  • G. Stoet, D. Geary
  • Published 2012
  • Psychology
  • Review of General Psychology
  • Men and women score similarly in most areas of mathematics, but a gap favoring men is consistently found at the high end of performance. One explanation for this gap, stereotype threat, was first proposed by Spencer, Steele, and Quinn (1999) and has received much attention. We discuss merits and shortcomings of this study and review replication attempts. Only 55% of the articles with experimental designs that could have replicated the original results did so. But half of these were confounded… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Tables from this paper.

    Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis.
    • 131
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    The new science of cognitive sex differences
    • 280
    • PDF
    An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls' mathematics performance.
    • 81
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Stereotype Threat.
    • 156
    • PDF
    Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators
    • 83
    • PDF
    Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis.
    • 48
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 97 REFERENCES
    Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
    • 6,348
    • PDF
    Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
    • 2,656
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The gender similarities hypothesis.
    • 2,056
    • PDF
    Gender differences.
    • 2,976
    • PDF
    Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.
    • 668
    • PDF
    A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance.
    • 369
    Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
    • 5,746
    • PDF