Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study

@article{Findley2016CanRR,
  title={Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study},
  author={Michael G. Findley and Nathan M. Jensen and Edmund J. Malesky and Thomas B. Pepinsky},
  journal={Comparative Political Studies},
  year={2016},
  volume={49},
  pages={1667 - 1703}
}
In 2015, Comparative Political Studies embarked on a landmark pilot study in research transparency in the social sciences. The editors issued an open call for submissions of manuscripts that contained no mention of their actual results, incentivizing reviewers to evaluate manuscripts based on their theoretical contributions, research designs, and analysis plans. The three papers in this special issue are the result of this process that began with 19 submissions. In this article, we describe the… Expand
Preventing the ends from justifying the means: withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review
Results-blind review: a masked crusader for science
Publication Biases in Replication Studies
Publication Biases in Replication Studies
If journals embraced conditional equivalence testing, would research be better?
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 233 REFERENCES
Research Preregistration in Political Science: The Case, Counterarguments, and a Response to Critiques
Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.
An Equivalence Approach to Balance and Placebo Tests
Increasing the Credibility of Political Science Research: A Proposal for Journal Reforms
  • B. Nyhan
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2015
Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
...
1
2
3
4
5
...