Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory

@article{Suhler2011CanIM,
  title={Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory},
  author={Christopher L. Suhler and Patricia S. Churchland},
  journal={Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
  year={2011},
  volume={23},
  pages={2103-2116}
}
Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory is an influential scientific account of morality incorporating psychological, developmental, and evolutionary perspectives. The theory proposes that morality is built upon five innate “foundations,” each of which is believed to have been selected for during human evolution and, subsequently, tuned-up by learning during development. We argue here that although some general elements of Haidt's theory are plausible, many other important aspects of his… 

Some controversies around moral nativism

The theory of evolution sparked a series of questions about the origins of moral judgments and the underpinning principles. In particular, it reinforced the debate about moral nativism. In this paper

A Functional Neuroimaging Investigation of Moral Foundations Theory.

Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) posits that the human mind contains modules (or "foundations") that are functionally specialized to moralize unique dimensions of the social world: Authority, Loyalty,

Under- and Overspecification in Moral Foundation Theory. The Problematic Search for a Moderate Version of Innatism

Jonathan Haidt’s theory is probably the most promising framework from which to integrate the different lines of interdisciplinary research that deal with the evolutionary foundations of moral psychology, but it shows a critical underspecification concerning the precise mental processes that instantiate the triggering of the authors' evolved moral intuitions.

Are Moral Intuitions Heritable?

This work examines the heritability of moral psychology using the moral dilemmas approach commonly used in Dual Process Theory research, and finds consistent and significant evidence of heritability.

Understanding the Adaptive Functions of Morality from a Cognitive Psychological Perspective

This review suggests that the limitations of accounts claiming that morality is composed of many distinct domains can be overcome by systematically investigating the cognitive mechanisms that support moral judgments across descriptively distinct domains.

Running head: MORAL FOUNDATIONS THEORY

Where does morality come from? Why are moral judgments often so similar across cultures, yet sometimes so variable? Is morality one thing, or many? Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) was created to

Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology

Originally developed to explain cultural variation in moral judgments, moral foundations theory (MFT) has become widely adopted as a theory of political ideology. MFT posits that political attitudes

Moral foundations theory in autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative investigation

Interviews and qualitative analysis found that all five moral foundations of moral foundations theory were represented in the interviews, yet certain foundations appeared more prominent than others.

Considering Moral Foundations Theory and the Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars in the context of child and adolescent development

ABSTRACT Theorizing posits that moral judgment and reasoning stem from intuitions from at least one of six cognitive moral modules. Research has examined how media exposure influences aspects of

Moral Nativism: Some Controversies

This paper scrutinizes two research programs that advocate respectively for the existence of a universal moral grammar and a predisposition to moralize behaviours with certain contents. It focuses on
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 132 REFERENCES

The Neural Mechanisms of Moral Cognition: A Multiple-Aspect Approach to Moral Judgment and Decision-Making

We critically review themushrooming literature addressing the neuralmechanisms of moral cognition (NMMC), reachingthe following broad conclusions: (1) researchmainly focuses on three

Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology

In Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology, Robert Richardson takes a critical look at evolutionary psychology by subjecting its ambitious and controversial claims to the same sorts of methodological and evidential constraints that are broadly accepted within evolutionary biology.

The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations.

This chapter defends the view that thought processes might be modular too, and argues that perceptual and linguistic decoding processes are modular, much more than on the alleged nonmodularity of thought.

Evolutionary Psychology, Meet Developmental Neurobiology: Against Promiscuous Modularity

It is argued that, while the adult human mind/brain typically contains a degree of modularization, its “modules” are neither genetically specified nor evolutionary adaptations, rather, they result from the brain's developmental plasticity, which allows environmental task demands a large role in shaping the brain’s information-processing structures.

Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations

Why do people vary in their views of human nature and their visions of the good society? Why do many people categorize themselves as “liberal,” “conservative,” “libertarian,” “socialist,” and so on?

Planet of the Durkheimians : Where Community , Authority , and Sacredness Are Foundations of Morality

Most academic efforts to understand morality and ideology come from theorists who limit the domain of morality to issues related to harm and fairness. For such theorists, conservative beliefs are

Planet of the Durkheimians: Where Community, Authority, and Sacredness Are Foundations of Morality

Most academic efforts to understand morality and ideology come from theorists who limit the domain of morality to issues related to harm and fairness. For such theorists, conservative beliefs are

Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.

Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture

The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: the origins of concepts of living things Frank Keil Part IV and Implications for Education.
...