• DOI:10.1023/A:1009272228097
• Corpus ID: 146317834

Caesareans and Cyborgs

@article{Lim1999CaesareansAC,
  title={Caesareans and Cyborgs},
  author={Hilary Lim},
  journal={Feminist Legal Studies},
  year={1999},
  volume={7},
  pages={133-173}
}

• Hilary Lim
• Published 1 May 1999
• Art
• Feminist Legal Studies

This paper argues that cyborg perspectives offer real possibilities for the debate around enforced caesareans and the search for a language to encompass embodied maternal subjectivity. It is suggested, with reference to the fictional narrative of Star Trek, that cyborg figures have the power to disrupt the liberal subject and the body in legal discourse, not least because the plethora of cyborgs challenges simple conceptions of connections/disconnections between bodies. Feminist readings of case law relating to enforced caesarean sections have raised questions about the notion of autonomy at the heart of liberal legalism, have argued that law is complicit with white male techno-medicine's approach to childbirth and focused upon the pregnant woman's lived experience of pregnancy. The recent Court of Appeal decision in St George's Healthcare N.H.S Trust v. S., Regina v. Collins and Others, ex parte S., where the pregnant woman's self-determination was upheld, provides a good opportunity to confront both the liberal story and the idea of connectedness between mother and unborn child.