Corpus ID: 56469527

CONTINGENCY HYPOTHESES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH : USE , DISUSE , OR MISUSE ?

@inproceedings{Carey2011CONTINGENCYHI,
  title={CONTINGENCY HYPOTHESES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH : USE , DISUSE , OR MISUSE ?},
  author={W. P. Carey},
  year={2011}
}
  • W. P. Carey
  • Published 2011
  • The answer to many strategic management research questions is often summarized as ‘It depends.’ Faced with marginal results of many main effect hypothesis tests of one variable on another variable, strategy researchers began developing contingency hypotheses that explored more nuanced relationships involving multiple variables. Herein, we examine the development of contingency thinking in strategic management via a review of all empirical papers published in Strategic Management Journal from… CONTINUE READING
    39 Citations

    Figures and Tables from this paper

    Understanding “It Depends” in Organizational Research
    • 35
    Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations
    • 40
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    CEO Succession Origin and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study
    • 42
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study
    • 52
    • PDF
    Do Management Controls Mitigate the Impact of Logistics Turbulence on Performance?
    • Highly Influenced

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 113 REFERENCES
    The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues
    • 1,133
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality?
    • 305
    • PDF
    Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.".
    • 906
    Strategic groups: Untested assertions and research proposals
    • 412
    A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics
    • 925
    • PDF
    Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research—a critical review
    • 373
    • PDF