CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol 3 (2018): The CLIC potential for new physics
@inproceedings{Blas2018CERNYR,
title={CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol 3 (2018): The CLIC potential for new physics},
author={Jorge de Blas and Roberto Franceschini and Francesco Riva and Philipp Roloff and Ulrike Schnoor and Michael Spannowsky and James D. Wells and Andrea Wulzer and Jure Zupan and Samuel Alipour-fard and Wolfgang Altmannshofer and Aleksandr Azatov and Duarte Azevedo and Julien Baglio and Martin Bauer and Fady Bishara and J. J. Blaising and Simon Brass and Dario Buttazzo and Zackaria Chacko and Nathaniel Craig and Y. Cui and Daniel Dercks and P. S. Bhupal Dev and Luca Di Luzio and Stefano Di Vita and Gauthier Durieux and J. Fan and Patr{\'i}cia Maria Ferreira and Claudia Frugiuele and E. Fuchs and Ignacio Garc'ia and M. Ghezzi and Admir Greljo and Ramona Grober and Christophe Grojean and J. L. Gu and Ross John Hunter and Aniket Joglekar and Jan Kalinowski and Wolfgang Kilian and Can Kilic and Wojciech Kotlarski and Marcin Kucharczyk and Emilia Leogrande and L. Linssen and D. Liu and Z. Liu and Davide Maria Lombardo and Ian Low and Oleksii Matsedonskyi and David Marzocca and Ken Mimasu and Alexander Mitov and Manimala Mitra and R. N. Mohapatra and G. Moortgat-pick and Milada M. Muhlleitner and Saereh Najjari and Marco Nardecchia and Matthias Neubert and J. M. No and Giuliano Panico and Luca Panizzi and Ayan Paul and Mart'in Perell'o and Gilad Perez and Alexis D. Plascencia and Giovanni Marco Pruna and Diego Redigolo and Matthew Reece and J{\"u}rgen Reuter and Marc Riembau and T. Robens and Aidan Robson and Krzysztof Rolbiecki and Andr'e Sailer and Kodai Sakurai and Filippo Sala and R. Santos and Matthias Schlaffer and So Young Shim and Brian Shuve and Rosa Simoniello and Dorota Sokołowska and R. G. Strom and Tim M. P. Tait and Andrea Tesi and Andrea Thamm and Naomi van der Kolk and Thibaud Vantalon and Christopher B. Verhaaren and Marcel Vos and Nigel Keith Watson and C. Weiland and Alasdair Winter and Jonas Wittbrodt and Tomasz Wojton and B Q Xu and Z. Y. Yin and Aleksander Filip Żarnecki and C. Zhang and Y. Zhang},
year={2018}
}Author(s): Blas, J de; Franceschini, R; Riva, F; Roloff, P; Schnoor, U; Spannowsky, M; Wells, JD; Wulzer, A; Zupan, J; Alipour-Fard, S; Altmannshofer, W; Azatov, A; Azevedo, D; Baglio, J; Bauer, M; Bishara, F; Blaising, J-J; Brass, S; Buttazzo, D; Chacko, Z; Craig, N; Cui, Y; Dercks, D; Dev, PS Bhupal; Luzio, L Di; Vita, S Di; Durieux, G; Fan, J; Ferreira, P; Frugiuele, C; Fuchs, E; Garcia, I; Ghezzi, M; Greljo, A; Grober, R; Grojean, C; Gu, J; Hunter, R; Joglekar, A; Kalinowski, J; Kilian, W…
Figures and Tables from this paper
figure 1 
table 1 
figure 2 
table 2 
figure 3 
table 3 
figure 4 
table 4 
figure 5 
table 5 
figure 6 
table 6 
figure 7 
table 7 
figure 8 
table 8 
figure 9 
table 9 
figure 10 
table 10 
figure 11 
table 11 
figure 12 
table 12 
figure 13 
table 13 
figure 14 
table 14 
figure 15 
table 15 
figure 16 
table 16 
figure 17 
table 17 
figure 18 
table 18 
figure 19 
table 19 
figure 20 
table 20 
figure 21 
table 21 
figure 22 
table 22 
figure 23 
table 23 
figure 24 
table 24 
figure 25 
table 25 
figure 26 
table 26 
figure 27 
table 27 
figure 28 
table 28 
figure 29 
table 29 
figure 30 
table 30 
figure 31 
table 31 
figure 32 
table 32 
figure 33 
table 33 
figure 34 
table 34 
figure 35 
table 35 
figure 36 
table 36 
figure 37 
table 37 
figure 38 
table 38 
figure 39 
table 39 
figure 40 
table 40 
figure 41 
table 41 
figure 42 
table 42 
figure 43 
table 43 
figure 44 
table 44 
figure 45 
table 45 
figure 46 
table 46 
figure 47 
table 47 
figure 48 
table 48 
figure 49 
table 49 
figure 50 
table 50 
figure 51 
table 51 
figure 52 
table 52 
figure 53 
table 53 
figure 54 
table 54 
figure 55 
table 55 
figure 56 
figure 57 
figure 58 
figure 59 
figure 60 
figure 61 
figure 62 
figure 63 
figure 64 
figure 65 
figure 66 
figure 67 
figure 68 
figure 70 
figure 71 
figure 72 
figure 73 
figure 74 
figure 75 
figure 76 
figure 77 
figure 78 
figure 79 
figure 80 
figure 81 
figure 82 
figure 83 
figure 84 
figure 85 
figure 86 
figure 87 
figure 88 
figure 89 
figure 90 
figure 91 
figure 92 
figure 93 
figure 94 
figure 95 
figure 96 
figure 97 
figure 98 
figure 99 
figure 100 
figure 101 
figure 102 
figure 103 
figure 104 
figure 105 
figure 106 
figure 107 
figure 109 
figure 110 
figure 111 
figure 112 
figure 113 
figure 114 
figure 115 
figure 116 
figure 117 
figure 118 
figure 119 
figure 120 
figure 121 
figure 122 
figure 123 
figure 124 
figure 125 
figure 126 
figure 127 
figure 128
56 Citations
Rare top decays as probes of flavorful Higgs bosons
- PhysicsPhysical Review D
- 2019
We study a version of Two Higgs Doublet Models with non-standard flavor violation in the up quark sector. We find branching ratios for the rare top decays $t\to hc$ and $t\to hu$ that are within…
Beyond the Standard Model physics at CLIC
- Physics, Education
- 2019
A summary of the recent results from CERN Yellow Report on the CLIC potential for new physics is presented, with emphasis on the direct search for new physics scenarios motivated by the open issues…
The new $$(g-2)_\mu $$ result and the $$\mu \nu $$SSM
- Art, PhysicsThe European Physical Journal C
- 2021
<jats:p>The <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$\mu \nu \mathrm {SSM}$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<mml:mrow>…
A novel approach to Landau damping of transverse collective instabilities in future hadron colliders
- Physics
- 2019
Transverse collective instabilities induced by the beam-coupling impedance of the accelerator structure lead to beam quality degradation and pose a major limitation to the machine performance. Landau…
The CLIC potential for new physics
- PhysicsProceedings of The European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(EPS-HEP2021)
- 2022
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a mature option for a future electron-positron collider operating at centre-of-mass energies of up to 3 TeV. It incorporates a novel two-beam acceleration…
Sensitivity of Future \(e^+e^-\) Colliders to Processes of Dark Matter Production with Light Mediator Exchange
- PhysicsActa Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement
- 2022
One of the primary goals of the proposed future collider experiments is to search for dark matter (DM) particles using different experimental approaches. High energy e+e− colliders offer unique…
The tiny (g-2) muon wobble from small-μ supersymmetry
- PhysicsJournal of High Energy Physics
- 2022
A new measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, g μ − 2, has been reported by the Fermilab Muon g-2 collaboration and shows a 4 . 2 σ departure from the most precise and reliable calculation…
C$^3$: A"Cool"Route to the Higgs Boson and Beyond
- Physics
- 2021
We present a proposal for a cold copper distributed coupling accelerator that can provide a rapid route to precision Higgs physics with a compact 8 km footprint. This proposal is based on recent…
Muon g − 2 and Co-annihilating Dark Matter in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
- Physics
- 2021
We demonstrate that the recent measurement of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon and dark matter can be simultaneously explained within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Dark matter…
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 607 REFERENCES
TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis
- Computer Science
- 2007
n high-energy physics, with the search for ever smaller signals in ever larger data sets, it has become essential to extract a maximum of the available information from the data. Multivariate…
Non-resonant collider signatures of a singlet-driven electroweak phase transition
- Physics
- 2017
A bstractWe analyze the collider signatures of the real singlet extension of the Standard Model in regions consistent with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition and a singlet-like scalar…
Baryogenesis for weakly interacting massive particles
- Physics
- 2013
We propose a robust, unified framework, in which the similar baryon and dark matter cosmic abundances both arise from the physics of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), with the rough…
Testing electroweak baryogenesis with future colliders
- Physics
- 2014
A bstractElectroweak Baryogenesis (EWBG) is a compelling scenario for explaining the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe. Its connection to the electroweak phase transition makes it…
HL/HE-LHC Physics Workshop Report: Higgs physics opportunities, TO APPEAR
- WE USE PRELIMINARY RESULTS AS OF NOVEMBER 15,
- 2018
05 06 25 6 v 2 7 F eb 2 01 5 The Twin Higgs : Natural Electroweak Breaking from Mirror Symmetry
- Physics
- 2015
We present ‘twin Higgs models’, simple realizations of the Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson that protect the weak scale from radiative corrections up to scales of order 5 10 TeV. In the ultra-violet…
Updated CLIC luminosity staging baseline and Higgs coupling prospects
- Physics
- 2018
An updated luminosity staging baseline for CLIC is presented. Assuming accelerator ramp-up and up-time scenarios that are harmonized with those of other potential future colliders, CLIC will deliver…
Global and optimal probes for the top-quark effective field theory at future lepton colliders
- PhysicsJournal of High Energy Physics
- 2018
A bstractWe study the sensitivity to physics beyond the standard model of precise top-quark pair production measurements at future lepton colliders. A global effective-field-theory approach is…
Testing the scalar sector of the twin Higgs model at colliders
- Physics
- 2017
We consider Mirror Twin Higgs models in which the breaking of the global symmetry is realized linearly. In this scenario, the radial mode in the Higgs potential is present in the spectrum, and…