Burden of Proof in Legal Argumentation

@inproceedings{Farley1995BurdenOP,
  title={Burden of Proof in Legal Argumentation},
  author={Arthur M. Farley and Kathleen Freeman},
  booktitle={ICAIL},
  year={1995}
}
We present a computational model of dialectical argumentation that could serve as a basis for studying elements of legal reasoning. Argumentation is well-suited to decisionmaking in the legal domain, where knowledge is incomplete, uncertain, and inconsistent, We model an argument both as information structure, i.e., argument units connecting claims with supporting data, and as dialectical process, i.e., an alternating series of moves made by opposing sides. Inspired by the legal domain, our… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 69 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

70 Citations

0510'96'01'07'13
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 70 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-2 of 2 references

How to reason

  • J. Pollock
  • 1992
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Embracing causality

  • J. Pearl
  • 1987
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…