Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes

@article{Matus2006BroadTA,
  title={Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes},
  author={David Q. Matus and Richard R. Copley and Casey W. Dunn and Andreas Hejnol and Heather Eccleston and Kenneth M. Halanych and Mark Q. Martindale and Maximilian J. Telford},
  journal={Current Biology},
  year={2006},
  volume={16},
  pages={R575-R576}
}

Figures from this paper

Phylogeny: The Continuing Classificatory Conundrum of Chaetognaths

Phylomitogenomic analyses strongly support the sister relationship of the Chaetognatha and Protostomia

Phylogenetic analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences of protein‐coding genes from 85 mitogenomes of 19 groups suggests the Chaetognatha to be a sister group to the protostomes, a result consistent with evidences from the developmental pattern and other molecular analyses.

Evolutionary history of Chaetognatha inferred from molecular and morphological data: a case study for body plan simplification

The distribution of some morphological characters traditionally used in systematics and for species diagnosis suggests that the diversity in Chaetognatha was produced through a process of mosaic evolution.

Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes

Ribosomal RNA genes are considered a reliable source for the study of deep divergences in the metazoan tree, provided that the data are treated carefully and the LBA effect is minimized.

Spiralian Phylogenomics Supports the Resurrection of Bryozoa Ectoprocta and Entoprocta

It is suggested that classical developmental and morphological key characters such as cleavage pattern, coelomic cavities, gut architecture, and body segmentation are subject to greater evolutionary plasticity than traditionally assumed.

Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta.

The findings suggest that classical developmental and morphological key characters such as cleavage pattern, coelomic cavities, gut architecture, and body segmentation are subject to greater evolutionary plasticity than traditionally assumed.

Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria

The sister-group relationship of Platyhelminthes and Annelida to the exclusion of Mollusca, contradicting the Neotrochozoa hypothesis, and, with a lower statistical support, the paraphyly of Deuterostomia are discussed in an evo–devo framework.

Barcoding of Arrow Worms (Phylum Chaetognatha) from Three Oceans: Genetic Diversity and Evolution within an Enigmatic Phylum

DNA barcodes of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase c subunit I (COI) gene are analyzed from 52 specimens of 14 species of chaetognaths collected mainly from the Atlantic Ocean, revealing hitherto unseen genetic variation among species of arrow worms.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Identification of chaetognaths as protostomes is supported by the analysis of their mitochondrial genome.

The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of Spadella cephaloptera is determined, it is the smallest metazoan mitochondrial genome known and lacks both atp8 and atp6 and all tRNA genes, and phylogenetic reconstructions show that Chaetognatha belongs to protostomes.

Chaetognath phylogenomics: a protostome with deuterostome-like development

The mitochondrial genome of Paraspadella gotoi is highly reduced and reveals that chaetognaths are a sister group to protostomes.

Comparisons here of amino acid sequences from mitochondrially encoded proteins give a single most parsimonious tree that supports a position of Chaetognatha as sister to the protostomes studied here.

Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia.

This study demonstrates that the incongruences observed between rRNA and multigene analyses were indeed due to long-branch attraction artifacts, illustrating the enormous impact of systematic biases on phylogenomic studies and suggests that urochordates are more closely related to vertebrates than are cephalochordates.

THE NEW VIEW OF ANIMAL PHYLOGENY

Many questions persist concerning relationships within Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa, poriferan monophyly, and the placement of many less-studied taxa (e.g., kinorhynchs, gastrotrichs, gnathostomulids, and entoprocts).

Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals

The results suggest that ecdysis (moulting) arose once and support the idea of a new clade, Ecdysozoa, containing moulting animals: arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, nematodes, Nematomorphs, kinor-hynchs and priapulids.

Trochophore concepts: ciliary bands and the evolution of larvae in spiralian Metazoa

The results favour the conclusion that the trochophore, if defined as a feeding larval form using opposed bands, should not be regarded as an ancestral (= plesiomorphic) type for the Spiralia, or any other large taxon such as the Polychaeta or Mollusca.

Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes.

It is concluded that molecular systematists should use combined LSU + SSU rRNA genes rather than SSU alone for phylogenetic analyses, as both Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa were strongly supported and the position of chaetognaths within protostomes remains uncertain.

Animal evolution: Interrelationships of living Phyla

This volume is unique in concentrating on the fauna of the Middle East so it has descriptions of the anatomy of many animals rarely even mentioned in traditional invertebrate texts, for example bivalve anatomy is illustrated by Spathopsis and Coelatura, and earthworms by Aporrectodea and Pheretima.

A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians

This study demonstrates that Platyhelminthes are polyphyletic and that acoels and nemertodermatids are the extant earliest bilaterians, and that the common bilaterian ancestor was not, as currently held, large and complex but small, simple, and likely with direct development.