• Corpus ID: 250088857

Bridging America's Divide on Abortion, Guns and Immigration: An Experimental Study

@inproceedings{Belot2022BridgingAD,
  title={Bridging America's Divide on Abortion, Guns and Immigration: An Experimental Study},
  author={Mich{\`e}le Belot and Guglielmo Briscese},
  year={2022}
}
Americans appear increasingly polarized and unable to bridge ideological divides. We study individuals’ willingness to engage with others who hold opposite views on polarizing policies. Two thousand five hundred Americans are given the opportunity to listen to recordings of fellow countrymen and women expressing their views on immigration, abortion laws and gun ownership laws. We find that most Americans (more than two-thirds) are willing to listen to a view opposite to theirs, and a small… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES

The “contact hypothesis”: Critical reflections and future directions

Research on intergroup contact has grown exponentially over the past decade. Such research has typically extolled the benefits of positive interaction between members of historically divided

Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.

TLDR
Support is found for the hypothesis that intergroup discrimination in cooperation is the result of ingroup favoritism rather than outgroup derogation, and situations that contain interdependence result in stronger ingroups favoritism.

A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.

TLDR
The meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice, and this result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups.

Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

Similarity breeds connection. This principle—the homophily principle—structures network ties of every type, including marriage, friendship, work, advice, support, information transfer, exchange,

Beyond the optimal contact strategy: a reality check for the contact hypothesis.

TLDR
The authors critique some research practices that have come to dominate the field of contact and argue that these practices have limited the contact hypothesis both as an explanation of the intergroup dynamics of desegregation and as a framework for promoting social psychological change.

The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement

TLDR
The results suggest that the medium through which people communicate may systematically influence the impressions they form of each other, and the tendency to denigrate the minds of the opposition may be tempered by giving them, quite literally, a voice.

The Robbers Cave experiment : intergroup conflict and cooperation

Originally issued in 1954 and updated in 1961 and 1987, this pioneering study of "small group" conflict and cooperation has long been out-of-print. It is now available, in cloth and paper, with a new

Social categorization and intergroup behaviour

The aim of the studies was to assess the effefcs of social categorization on intergroup behaviour when, in the intergroup situation, neither calculations of individual interest nor previously

The Extended Contact Hypothesis: A Meta-Analysis on 20 Years of Research

TLDR
This meta-analysis covers the 20 years of research that currently exists on the extended contact hypothesis and suggests that extended contact’s hypothesized relationship to intergroup attitudes is small-to-medium and exists independently of direct friendship.