Brain development after birth differs between Neanderthals and modern humans

@article{Gunz2010BrainDA,
  title={Brain development after birth differs between Neanderthals and modern humans},
  author={Philipp Gunz and Simon Neubauer and Bruno Maureille and Jean‐Jacques Hublin},
  journal={Current Biology},
  year={2010},
  volume={20},
  pages={R921-R922}
}

Figures from this paper

Brain development is similar in Neanderthals and modern humans
The evolution of modern human brain shape
TLDR
This work analyzes endocranial casts of Homo sapiens fossils from different time periods to show that, 300,000 years ago, brain size in early H. sapiens already fell within the range of present-day humans.
Neonatal postcrania from Mezmaiskaya, Russia, and Le Moustier, France, and the development of Neandertal body form
TLDR
Neandertal neonates studied are able to establish that, as for the skull, many differences in body form are present by the time of birth, and it is found that neonatal Neandertals already appear to possess the wide body, long pubis, and robust long bones of adult Ne andertals.
Evolution of the base of the brain in highly encephalized human species.
TLDR
Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analyses of endobasicranial shape reveal previously undocumented details of evolutionary changes in Homo sapiens, including larger olfactory bulbs, relatively wider orbitofrontal cortex, relatively increased and forward projecting temporal lobe poles appear unique to modern humans.
Evidence for expansion of the precuneus in human evolution
TLDR
Comparison of medial brain morphology between humans and chimpanzees and MRI-derived structural brain templates suggests that precuneus expansion is a neurological specialization of H. sapiens that evolved in the last 150,000 years that may be associated with recent human cognitive specializations.
Dental evidence for ontogenetic differences between modern humans and Neanderthals
TLDR
It is found that most Neanderthal tooth crowns grew more rapidly than modern human teeth, resulting in significantly faster dental maturation, consistent with recent cranial and molecular evidence for subtle developmental differences between Neanderthals and H. sapiens.
Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins
TLDR
The current palaeoanthropological evidence shows that, regarding life history and brain ontogeny, the Pleistocene hominin taxa display different patterns and that one cannot simply contrast an ‘ape- model’ to a ‘human-model’.
A Shared Pattern of Postnatal Endocranial Development in Extant Hominoids
TLDR
It is demonstrated that from late infancy to adulthood ontogenetic trajectories are similar among all hominoid species, but differ in the amount of shape change, and that during early ontogeny gorillas undergo more pronounced shape changes than do chimpanzees, indicative of a dissociation of size and shape change.
Functional Craniology, Human Evolution, and Anatomical Constraints in the Neanderthal Braincase
TLDR
Geometrical and structural constraints between the endocranial soft and hard tissues may have induced morphogenetic limits to the growth and developmental processes and it is tempting to wonder whether these limits may be also related to possible factors associated with the extinction of Neanderthals.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
Neanderthal brain size at birth provides insights into the evolution of human life history
TLDR
Virtual reconstructions of a Neanderthal neonate from Mezmaiskaya Cave (Russia) and of two Neanderthal infant skeletons from Dederiyeh Cave (Syria) now provide new comparative insights: Neanderthal brain size at birth was similar to that in recent Homo sapiens and most likely subject to similar obstetric constraints.
Facial ontogeny in Neanderthals and modern humans
One hundred and fifty years after the discovery of Neanderthals, it is held that this morphologically and genetically distinct human species does not differ from modern Homo sapiens in its
Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity
TLDR
Computerized fossil reconstruction and geometric morphometrics are used to show that characteristic differences in cranial and mandibular shape between Neanderthals and modern humans arose very early during development, possibly prenatally, and were maintained throughout postnatal ontogeny.
The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens
TLDR
Cranial variation among Pleistocene and recent human fossils is examined by using a model of cranial growth to identify unique derived features (autapomorphies) that reliably distinguish fossils attributed to “anatomically modern” H. sapiens from those attributed to various taxa of “archaic” Homo spp.
Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: Evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages
TLDR
The origin of the authors' species may have represented the opportunity to surpass the constraints imposed on encephalization by the ontogenetic pattern shared by nonmodern Homo representatives, and two different evolutionary trajectories are identified.
Endocranial shape changes during growth in chimpanzees and humans: a morphometric analysis of unique and shared aspects.
Neandertal birth canal shape and the evolution of human childbirth
TLDR
The size of Tabun's reconstructed birth canal indicates that childbirth was about as difficult in Neandertals as in present-day humans, but the canal's shape indicates that Ne andertals had a more primitive birth mechanism.
A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome
TLDR
The genomic data suggest that Neandertals mixed with modern human ancestors some 120,000 years ago, leaving traces of Ne andertal DNA in contemporary humans, suggesting that gene flow from Neand Bertals into the ancestors of non-Africans occurred before the divergence of Eurasian groups from each other.
The evolution of hominin ontogenies.
Brain overgrowth in autism during a critical time in development: implications for frontal pyramidal neuron and interneuron development and connectivity
...
...