Bone tools from Beds II-IV, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, and implications for the origins and evolution of bone technology.

@article{Pante2020BoneTF,
  title={Bone tools from Beds II-IV, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, and implications for the origins and evolution of bone technology.},
  author={Michael C. Pante and Ignacio de la Torre and Francesco d’Errico and Jackson Njau and Robert J. Blumenschine},
  journal={Journal of human evolution},
  year={2020},
  volume={148},
  pages={
          102885
        }
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Testing the Integrity of the Middle and Later Stone Age Cultural Taxonomic Division in Eastern Africa
The long-standing debate concerning the integrity of the cultural taxonomies employed by archaeologists has recently been revived by renewed theoretical attention and the application of new
The evolution of combinatoriality and compositionality in hominid tool use: a comparative perspective
TLDR
A novel system to evaluate the level of hierarchical nesting of tool components in single tool use activities is devised, demonstrating that nonhuman primates, and by extension, the last common ancestor shared by Pan and Homo, are capable of basic combinatoriality; however, their technology does not approach the compositionality observable in modern human tool use.
Animals for Tools: The Origin and Development of Bone Technologies in China
The origin and development of bone technologies in China are reviewed in the light of recent discoveries and compared to trends emerging from the European and African archaeological records. Three
Archaeology of the Perishable
TLDR
This study highlights how environmental and cultural factors shape chimpanzee technology and identifies similarities to raw material selection processes inferred for Oldowan tool users.
A 115,000-year-old expedient bone technology at Lingjing, Henan, China
TLDR
This work compares a large sample of the faunal remains from Lingjing, a 115 ka-old site from China, with bone fragments produced by experimentally fracturing Equus caballus long bones, and provides a set of qualitative and quantitative criteria that can help zooarchaeologists and bone technologists distinguish faunaal remains with intentional flake removal scars from those resulting from carcass processing activities.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 108 REFERENCES
Additional evidence on the early hominid bone tools from Swartkrans with reference to spatial distribution of lithic and organic artefacts
TLDR
No significant differences were observed between Members 1–3 in the type and size of the bone fragments used as tools as well as in the length and type of the wear pattern, suggesting that no major changes occurred through time in the subsistence strategy for which the tools were used.
A 1.4-million-year-old bone handaxe from Konso, Ethiopia, shows advanced tool technology in the early Acheulean
TLDR
A rare example of a 1.4-million-y-old large bone fragment shaped into handaxe-like form of a hippopotamus femur from the ∼1.4 Mya sediments of the Konso Formation in southern Ethiopia, which is the oldest known extensively flaked example from the Early Pleistocene.
Using Bones to Shape Stones: MIS 9 Bone Retouchers at Both Edges of the Mediterranean Sea
TLDR
Two bone retouchers dated to the Middle Pleistocene MIS 9 used for the shaping of lithic artefacts are presented, which seem to reflect convergent processes that may be viewed in a wider cultural context as reflecting new technology-related behavioural patterns as well as new perceptions in stone tool manufacturing.
Bone tools: an experimental approach
Recognizing bone tools is important in the understanding of ancient people. When people first used bones as tools, animals became a source of raw material for artifact production, and local fauna was
...
...