Body Maps of Moral Concerns

@article{Atari2020BodyMO,
  title={Body Maps of Moral Concerns},
  author={Mohammad Atari and Aida Mostafazadeh Davani and Morteza Dehghani},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2020},
  volume={31},
  pages={160 - 169}
}
It has been proposed that somatosensory reaction to varied social circumstances results in feelings (i.e., conscious emotional experiences). Here, we present two preregistered studies in which we examined the topographical maps of somatosensory reactions associated with violations of different moral concerns. Specifically, participants in Study 1 (N = 596) were randomly assigned to respond to scenarios involving various moral violations and were asked to draw key aspects of their subjective… 
1 Citations

Figures from this paper

Foundations of morality in Iran

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES

Bodily maps of emotions

It is proposed that emotions are represented in the somatosensory system as culturally universal categorical somatotopic maps, and maps of bodily sensations associated with different emotions using a unique topographical self-report method.

Emotions as guardians of group norms: expressions of anger and disgust drive inferences about autonomy and purity violations

The results indicate that observers use others’ emotional reactions not only to infer whether a particular behaviour is inappropriate, but also why it is inappropriate: because it primarily violates autonomy standards or purity standards.

Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.

The problem of which cues, internal or external, permit a person to label and identify his own emotional state has been with us since the days that James (1890) first tendered his doctrine that "the

Maps of subjective feelings

Significance Subjective feelings are a central feature of human life, yet their relative organization has remained elusive. We mapped the “human feeling space” for 100 core feelings ranging from

Emotion and moral judgment.

A review of research findings that are in line with three increasingly strong claims about the role of emotion in moral judgment, highlighting recurring themes across these three categories of evidence, and identifying some open questions and areas for future research.

Bodily moral disgust: what it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion.

Findings from the lab and others show that, although many existing studies do not control for anger when studying disgust, disgust at nonbodily violations is often associated with anger and hard to separate from it, while bodily violations more consistently predict disgust independently of anger.

Two Minds Vs. Two Philosophies: Mind Perception Defines Morality and Dissolves the Debate Between Deontology and Utilitarianism

Mind perception is the essence of moral judgment. Broadly, moral standing is linked to perceptions of mind, with moral responsibility tied to perceived agency, and moral rights tied to perceived

Mapping the moral domain.

The Moral Foundations Questionnaire is developed on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions and convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant.

Interoceptive sensitivity and self-reports of emotional experience.

Two multimethod studies indicate that AF is linked to heightened interoceptive sensitivity, and people who were more sensitive to their heartbeats emphasized feelings of activation and deactivation when reporting their experiences of emotion over time more than did those who were less sensitive.

Bodily maps of emotions across child development.

Investigation of the development of bodily sensations associated with basic emotions in 6- to 17-year-old children and adolescents concludes that emotion-related bodily sensations become increasingly discrete over child development.