Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.

@article{Baggs2008BlindingIP,
  title={Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.},
  author={Judith G Baggs and Marion English Broome and Molly C. Dougherty and Margaret Comerford Freda and Margaret H Kearney},
  journal={Journal of advanced nursing},
  year={2008},
  volume={64 2},
  pages={131-8}
}
AIM This paper is a report of a study to assess the beliefs and preferences of reviewers for nursing journals about blinding of authors to reviewers, reviewers to authors, neither or both. BACKGROUND Blinding of author and reviewer names in the manuscript review process has been of interest to nursing editors, but reports that are based on data rather than simply opinion concern the editorial practices of biomedical rather than nursing journals. There has been no study of nursing journal… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 21 references

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer

  • R. A. McNutt
  • 1990
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Editorial freedom and integrity : you should be able to trust what you read

  • A. McNuttR.
  • American Journal of Nursing
  • 2003

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…