Blinded by neuroscience: social policy, the family and the infant brain

@article{Wastell2012BlindedBN,
  title={Blinded by neuroscience: social policy, the family and the infant brain},
  author={David Graham Wastell and Sue White},
  journal={Families,Relationships and Societies},
  year={2012},
  volume={1},
  pages={397-414}
}
Current social policy initiatives are promoting early intervention to improve the lives of disadvantaged children. Neuroscientific evidence is prominent in this discourse, creating the lustre of science, but too much has been taken on trust. In particular, the argument that the first three years are critical has created a now-or-never imperative to intervene before irreparable damage is done to the developing infant brain. A critique of current policy in the United Kingdom is provided here… Expand

Figures from this paper

Biologising parenting: neuroscience discourse, English social and public health policy and understandings of the child
TLDR
It is concluded that this focus on children's brains, with its accompanying deterministic perspective on parenting, overlooks children's embodied lives and this has implications for the design of children's health and welfare services. Expand
Neuroscience and family policy: What becomes of the parent?
This article discusses the findings of a study tracing the incorporation of claims about infant brain development into English family policy as part of the longer term development of a ‘parentExpand
Growing better brains? Pregnancy and neuroscience discourses in English social and welfare policies
TLDR
It is shown that a specific deterministic understanding of the developing brain that only has a loose relationship with current scientific evidence is an important component in these changes to wider understandings of the ‘at risk’ child and intensified surveillance over family life. Expand
Targeting brains, producing responsibilities: the use of neuroscience within British social policy.
TLDR
This article examines how UK policy reports focused on the early years, adolescence and older adults employ neuroscientific concepts and consequently (re)define responsibility, and demonstrates the importance of being mindful of the limits to the deployment of a neurobiological idiom within policy settings. Expand
Targeting brains , producing responsibilities
Concepts and findings ‘translated’ from neuroscientific research are finding their way into UK health and social policy discourse. Critical scholars have begun to analyse how policies tend toExpand
Brain-based discourses and early intervention: A critical debate for health visiting
Neuroscientific discourses about early brain development and its plasticity have placed considerable importance on parenting, emotional nurturing and attachment during the first 1001 ‘Critical Days’.Expand
Questioning the uncritical acceptance of neuroscience in child and family policy and practice: A review of challenges to the current doxa
INTRODUCTION: Recent directions in child and family policy in many Anglophone countries, including Aotearoa New Zealand, are underpinned by the adoption of prevention science which is used to justifyExpand
The ‘First Three Years’ Movement and the Infant Brain: A Review of Critiques
This article reviews a particular aspect of the critique of the increasing focus on the brain and neuroscience; what has been termed by some, 'neuromania'. It engages with the growing literatureExpand
Neuroscience and the risks of maltreatment
Findings from neuroimaging are increasingly being cited in policy debates to strengthen the case for early identification of, and intervention with, children at risk of maltreatment and poorExpand
Brave New Brains: Sociology, Family and the Politics of Knowledge
This article critically explores sociological arguments for greater biosocial synthesis, centring contemporary developments in public policy to demonstrate how such a reframing of humanity tends toExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
Annual Research Review: Parenting and children's brain development: the end of the beginning.
  • J. Belsky, M. de Haan
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
  • 2011
TLDR
Evidence suggesting that brain structure and function are 'chiselled' by parenting is reviewed, suggesting that tentative conclusions regarding effects of parenting on the developing brain may well be substantiated in future research. Expand
From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development
How we raise young children is one of today's most highly personalized and sharply politicized issues, in part because each of us can claim some level of "expertise." The debate has intensified asExpand
Nature, nurture, and development: from evangelism through science toward policy and practice.
  • M. Rutter
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Child development
  • 2002
TLDR
A summary review of the real gains in knowledge, some of the misleading claims, and the potential for research and for science-led improvements in policies and practice are provided. Expand
Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law
Is there such a thing as a criminally “violent brain”? Does it make sense to speak of “the neurobiology of violence” or the “psychopathology of crime”? Is it possible to answer on a physiologicalExpand
A commentary on deprivation-specific psychological patterns: effects of institutional deprivation.
  • M. Gunnar
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
  • 2010
TLDR
Because "natural experiments" always confront researchers with difficult choices among never perfect options, the authors' decision to provide a detailed discussion of their deliberative process, in addition to the richness of their data and the importance of their topic, is what makes this a likely classic in the field. Expand
The brain seduction: the public perception of neuroscience
The increasing number of magazine covers dedicated to brain studies and the success of magazines and scientific journals entirely dedicated to brain and mind indicate a strong interest on theseExpand
The link between child abuse and psychopathology: A review of neurobiological and genetic research
TLDR
Brain imaging research in children and adults is providing evidence of several structural and functional brain differences associated with early adversity, which may represent adaptations to early experiences of heightened stress that lead to an increased risk of psychopathology. Expand
‘Screen and intervene’: governing risky brains
  • N. Rose
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • History of the human sciences
  • 2010
TLDR
It is argued that a new diagram is emerging in the criminal justice system as it encounters developments in the neurosciences, developing around the themes of susceptibility, risk, pre-emption and precaution. Expand
Childhood Experience and the Expression of Genetic Potential: What Childhood Neglect Tells Us About Nature and Nurture
Studies of childhood abuse and neglect haveimportant lessons for considerations of natureand nurture. While each child has uniquegenetic potentials, both human and animalstudies point to importantExpand
Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience
The search for mind-brain relationships, with a particular emphasis on distinguishing hyperbole from solid empirical results in brain imaging studies.Cognitive neuroscience explores the relationshipExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...