• DOI:10.1111/jth.12248
• Corpus ID: 8286900

Bleeders, bleeding rates, and bleeding score

@article{Tosetto2013BleedersBR,
  title={Bleeders, bleeding rates, and bleeding score},
  author={Alberto Tosetto and Giancarlo Castaman and Francesco Rodeghiero},
  journal={Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis},
  year={2013},
  volume={11},
  pages={142 - 50}
}

• A. Tosetto, G. Castaman, F. Rodeghiero
• Published 1 June 2013
• Medicine
• Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Bleeding symptoms are frequently reported even in otherwise healthy subjects, and differentiating a normal subject from a patient with a mild bleeding disorder (MBD) can be extremely challenging. The concept of bleeding rate, that is, the number of bleeding episodes occurring within a definite time, could be used as the unifying framework reconciling the bleeding risk observed in congenital and acquired coagulopathies into a single picture. For instance, primary prevention trials have shown that the incidence of non‐major bleeding symptoms in normal subjects is around five per 100 person‐years, and this figure is in accordance with the number of hemorrhagic symptoms reported by normal controls in observational studies on hemorrhagic disorders. The incidence of non‐major bleeding in patients with MBDs (e.g. in patients with type 1 VWD carrying the C1130F mutation) is also strikingly similar with that of patients taking antiplatelet drugs, and the incidence in moderately severe bleeding disorders (e.g. type 2 VWD) parallels that of patients taking vitamin K antagonists. The severity of a bleeding disorder may therefore be explained by a bleeding rate model, which also explains several common clinical observations. Appreciation of the bleeding rate of congenital and acquired conditions and of its environmental/genetic modifiers into a single framework will possibly allow the development of better prediction tools in the coming years and represents a major scientific effort to be pursued.