Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice?

@article{Maes1994BlamingTV,
  title={Blaming the victim: Belief in control or belief in justice?},
  author={J{\"u}rgen Maes},
  journal={Social Justice Research},
  year={1994},
  volume={7},
  pages={69-90}
}
  • J. Maes
  • Published 1 March 1994
  • Psychology
  • Social Justice Research
The attribution of responsibility to victims of bad fate (“blaming the victim”) is discussed under the perspective of Just World Theory (Lerner, 1980) and the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis (Walster, 1966; Shaver, 1970). Whereas Just World Theory suggests that the belief in a just world is the decisive motive of increased attributions of responsibility, the Defensive Attribution Hypothesis assumes that these attributions are motivated by the need to believe in internal locus of control… 
Belief in a Just World, Blaming the Victim, and Hate Crime Statutes
The earliest economic theory of discrimination proposed the subsequently neglected idea of a "vicious circle" of discrimination (Myrdal, 1944). We draw on psychological evidence (that people derive
Challenges to the construct validity of belief in a just world scales
Presents a critical analysis of the construct validity of belief in a just world (BJW) questionnaires as a measure of the justice motive according to M. Lerner. Based on theoretical, conceptual,
Examining the Intersection of Gender and Age in Victim Blaming
Examining the Intersection of Gender and Age in Victim Blaming Jerin Lee Victim blaming refers to an attributional tendency in which some level of responsibility for a negative outcome is placed on
The Effects of Belief in a Just World and Victim's Innocence on Secondary Victimization, Judgements of Justice and Deservingness
Several studies have shown that victims judged to be innocent are more liked and helped by observers than victims judged to be noninnocent. Nevertheless, objectively innocent victims are very often
Injustice in harm and loss
The major topics of this overview article are as follow: (i) A distinction is made between justice and deservedness. Suffered harm and loss may be judged undeserved with respect to the victim's prior
Methodological Strategies in Research to Validate Measures of Belief in a Just World
When I first came across Justice Motive Theory (JMT) and related research (Lerner, 1970; Lerner and Simmons, 1966), I was initially confused, then puzzled, and eventually fascinated by the idea that
The Just World Bias and Hate Crime Statutes
The issue of whether and how to justify penalty enhancements for hate crimes against members of disfavored groups has attracted widespread attention. Harel and Parchomovsky (1999) justify penalty
Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task.
  • C. Hafer
  • Medicine
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 2000
TLDR
It is suggested that innocent victims do threaten justice beliefs and responses to these victims may, at times, be attempts to reduce this threat.
Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task.
Two experiments tested whether innocent victims threaten observers' belief in a just world. In both experiments, participants viewed an innocent victim then performed a modified Stroop task in which
Beyond Value in Moral Phenomenology: The Role of Epistemic and Control Experiences
TLDR
It is argued that the epistemic experiences of observers of (im)moral behaviors, and the perceived epistemic experience of those observed, serve as a groundwork for understanding how truth and control motives are implicated in the moral judgment process.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Personal Causality and Attribution of Responsibility.
In this study we examined the relationship between the severity of negative consequences of a blameworthy behavior and attribution of responsibility for that behavior. Under the guise of comparing
Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis.
Wake Forest University Research concerned with motivational distortion in the attribution of responsibility for an accident is reviewed. The results of a statistical combination of 22 relevant
Attributions of blame and coping in the "real world": severe accident victims react to their lot.
TLDR
Analysis of victims' attributions of causality for their accidents and their ability to cope with severe misfortune suggested that blaming another and feeling that one could have avoided the accident were successful predictors of poor coping; self-blame was a successful predictor of good coping.
The Relationships of Observer Characteristics to Beliefs in the Causal Responsibility of Victims of Sexual Assault
Whereas much of the previous research has focused on the influence of victim characteristics on attributions of responsibility to a rape victim, the present study sought to assess the relative
Who's to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape
Principles of action identification theory were examined for their relevance to the allocation of responsibility for alleged rape. Subjects learned of a rape incident in which the motives of the
Perceived freedom, accident severity and empathic value as determinants of the attribution of responsibility
The effects of severity of an accident, perceived freedom of the perpetrator, and empathic value of the victim were examined in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. N = 192 participants read detailed
The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion
1. The Belief in a Just World.- 2. The First Experiment: The Effect of Fortuitous Reward.- 3. The Second Experiment: Observers' Reactions to the "Innocent Victim".- 4. The Third Experiment: The
Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting
The present study replicated and extended research on the effects of observer characteristics (i.e., gender and traditional vs. less traditional attitudes) on attributions of responsibility in a case
Models of Rape Judgment: Attributions Concerning Event, Perpetrator, and Victim.
Extensive past research has shown many informational cues (regarding perpetrator, victim, or situational context) to influence attributional judgments of responsibility for rape and perceptions of
Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape
This study examined the effects of the victim-perpetrator relationship on college students' attributions of responsibility for rape. In addition, the rape specificity of these attributions was
...
1
2
3
4
5
...