• Corpus ID: 8550041

Biology of implant osseointegration.

  title={Biology of implant osseointegration.},
  author={Andreas F. Mavrogenis and R{\'e}gis Dimitriou and Javad Parvizi and Georgios C Babis},
  journal={Journal of musculoskeletal \& neuronal interactions},
  volume={9 2},
Osseointegration refers to a direct structural and functional connection between ordered, living bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant. Currently, an implant is considered as osseointegrated when there is no progressive relative movement between the implant and the bone with which it has direct contact. A direct bone contact as observed histologically may be indicative of the lack of a local or systemic biological response to that surface. It is therefore proposed that… 

Figures from this paper

Physiology of Osseointegration.
  • J. W. LeeM. Bance
  • Medicine, Materials Science
    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America
  • 2019
Osseous Integration After Exenteration
The osseointegration has many advantages with few disadvantages compared to the traditional reconstruction techniques and can be avoided with careful selection of the patients, preoperative evaluation and planning, and a proper implant placement technique.
Osseointegration: biological events in relation to characteristics of the implant surface.
  • L. FellerR. Chandran J. Lemmer
  • Materials Science, Biology
    SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging
  • 2014
Some of the more important biological events of peri-implant bone wound healing in the process of osseointegration are reviewed, and how the biophysical properties of implant surfaces influence cellular responses are discussed.
Bone-Implant Interface in Patients with Neoplasmatic Disease
Osseointegration processes in the oncological patient may be altered due to local and systemic factors, and the biology of the tumor itself alters osteoblastic and osteoclastic pathways.
Surface Modification Techniques to Enhance Osseointegration of Spinal Implants.
Highlighting the biologic- and material-related advantages and inadequacies of current and potential implant materials as well as applications may guide further research and development of implant materials and designs.
Bone and Cartilage Interfaces With Orthopedic Implants: A Literature Review
Current knowledge reveals that the design of the implants closely mimicking the native structure is more likely to become well integrated, and several other techniques such as coating with a bioactive compound that will stimulate the integration and successful outcome for the patient are provided.
Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant – FEM investigation
The results of both approaches confirmed a significant reduction of investigated parameters such as the total implant displacements and stresses in the implanted components in comparison to non-coated variant, a very promising result for potential use of thermally sprayed HA coatings for cranial implants.
Mechanobiological model to study the influence of screw design and surface treatment on osseointegration
Simulations showed the ability of the model to reproduce biological events occurring at the implant interface through osteogenesis, providing a set of taxis-diffusion-reaction equations under the combined influence of mechanical and biochemical factors.


The concept of osseointegration and bone matrix expression.
  • C. StanfordJ. Keller
  • Biology
    Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists
  • 1991
A review of bone expression as a function of in vitro stress applications and a discussion of specific growth factors as they may relate to osseous healing around an implant are given.
Mechanisms of endosseous integration.
  • J. Davies
  • Medicine, Materials Science
    The International journal of prosthodontics
  • 1998
It is shown that peri-implant bone healing, which results in contact osteogenesis (bone growth on the implant surface), can be phenomenologically subdivided into three distinct phases that can be addressed experimentally.
Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants
Experimentally, bone ingrowth can occur in the presence of some movement, albeit very small (up to 28 μ), while excess movement can result in attachment by mature connective tissue ingrowth.
Osseointegration in arthroplasty: can simvastatin promote bone response to implants?
It is concluded that simvastatin has potential as a means of enhancing bone ingrowth, which is a key factor in the longevity of cementless implants, which depends on bone ing growth for long-term success.
Osteoporosis and biomaterial osteointegration.
Osseointegration of metallic implants. II. Transmission electron microscopy in the rabbit.
In a material of 10 osseointegrated implants of pure titanium, Tivanium, Vitallium, and stainless steel, 23 interface areas were studied by transmission electron microscopy. The implant site was the
The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone.
An experiment is described in which porous Vitallium staples were inserted across an unstable osteotomy site, indicating that bone ingrowth will not occur in the presence of movement of this order of magnitude, and some form of initial mechanical fixation is required.