Corpus ID: 237142269

Biologists need modern data infrastructure on campus

@inproceedings{Andreev2021BiologistsNM,
  title={Biologists need modern data infrastructure on campus},
  author={Andrey Andreev and Thomas E. Morrell and Kristin A. Briney and Sandra Gesing and Uri Manor},
  year={2021}
}
Modern tools for biological research, especially microscopy, have rapidly advanced in recent years [1][2], which has led to the generation of increasingly large amounts of data on a regular basis. The result is that scientists desperately need state-of-the-art technical infrastructure for raw data storage, transfer, and processing. These scientists currently rely on outdated ways to move and store data, costing valuable time and risking loss of valuable data. While the community is aware of… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Practical Guide to Storage of Large Amounts of Microscopy Data
TLDR
Common ways researchers store data are reviewed and different options compared when designing imaging experiments and a blueprint and budget estimation for a currently deployed data server used to store large datasets from zebrafish brain activity experiments using light-sheet microscopy are offered. Expand
Cloud-Native Repositories for Big Scientific Data
TLDR
The potential of cloud computing to accelerate scientific research is discussed and the concept of a "cloud native data repository," distinct from a traditional data repository, is defined. Expand
Data management and archiving in a large microscopy‐and‐imaging, multi‐user facility: Problems and solutions
TLDR
This review discusses the source of the problem: how data are produced by systems available today, and the information's specificity and relative importance; techniques for management of these data to maximize functionality of the facility; and practices that can be detrimental in the research core environment. Expand
A global view of standards for open image data formats and repositories.
TLDR
A shared, global view of criteria for these common, globally applicable guidelines and provisional proposals for open tools and resources that are available now and can provide a foundation for future development are presented. Expand
A perspective on Microscopy Metadata: data provenance and quality control
TLDR
An overview of the nature of microscopy metadata and its importance for fostering data quality, reproducibility, scientific rigor, and sharing value in light microscopy is provided. Expand
Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines
TLDR
To improve data sharing at the time of manuscript acceptance, researchers should be better motivated to release their data with real benefits such as recognition, or bonus points in grant and job applications, and surveillance of data sharing should be enforced by both academic publishers and funders. Expand
Data science in cell imaging.
TLDR
This Perspective surveys the rapidly expanding new field of data science in cell imaging, highlighting how data science tools are used within current image analysis pipelines, proposing a computation-first approach to derive new hypotheses from cell image data, and describing the next frontiers where data science will make an impact. Expand
Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices.
  • M. Whitlock
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Trends in ecology & evolution
  • 2011
TLDR
Suggestions on how data generators, data re-users, and journals can maximize the fairness and scientific value of data archiving are presented. Expand
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
TLDR
This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community. Expand
How Do Astronomers Share Data? Reliability and Persistence of Datasets Linked in AAS Publications and a Qualitative Study of Data Practices among US Astronomers
TLDR
An analysis of URL links embedded in papers published by the American Astronomical Society reveals that the total number of links included in the literature rose dramatically from 1997 until 2005, when it leveled off, and the uptake of that system to-date is analyzed. Expand
...
1
2
3
...