Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

@article{Hicks2015BibliometricsTL,
  title={Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics},
  author={D. Hicks and P. Wouters and L. Waltman and S. Rijcke and I. R{\`a}fols},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2015},
  volume={520},
  pages={429-431}
}
Nutzen Sie diese zehn Grundsatze um Forschung zu bewerten, drangen Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters und Kollegen. 
825 Citations
Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics.
  • 66
  • PDF
Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal
  • 18
  • PDF
Tendencies on Traditional Metrics.
  • 1
  • PDF
Are all paper citations equal
The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded
  • 12
  • PDF
Metrics and Rankings: Myths and Fallacies
  • 7
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
  • J. E. Hirsch
  • Physics, Computer Science
  • Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  • 2005
  • 6,945
  • PDF
Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
  • 565
  • PDF
Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff
  • 105
  • PDF
The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
  • 305
  • PDF
Policy
  • 386
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
...