Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review

@article{Nederhof2006BibliometricMO,
  title={Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review},
  author={Anton J. Nederhof},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2006},
  volume={66},
  pages={81-100}
}
SummaryThis paper addresses research performance monitoring of the social sciences and the humanities using citation analysis. Main differences in publication and citation behavior between the (basic) sciences and the social sciences and humanities are outlined. Limitations of the (S)SCI and A&HCI for monitoring research performance are considered. For research performance monitoring in many social sciences and humanities, the methods used in science need to be extended. A broader range of both… CONTINUE READING

Tables and Topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 266 CITATIONS

The structural role of the core literature in history

  • Scientometrics
  • 2017
VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2007
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 27 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 27 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES

The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship

J. W. THOMPSON
  • Libri
  • 2002
VIEW 12 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Trends in Publication and International Co-Publication Activity in the Social and Behavioral Sciences and the Humanities

A. J. NEDERHOF, E.C.M. NOYONS
  • 1990
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Leiden: CWTSbv, report 2003-03

M. S. VISSER, M. RONS, L. J. VAN DER WURFF, H. F. MOED, A. J. NEDERHOF
  • Bibliometrische studie van onderzoeksdisciplines aan de Vrije Universiteit Brussel,
  • 2003
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL