Bibliometric Evaluation vs . Informed Peer Review : Evidence from Italy

  title={Bibliometric Evaluation vs . Informed Peer Review : Evidence from Italy},
  author={Graziella Bertocchi and Alfonso Gambardella and Tullio Jappelli and Carmela Anna Nappi},
Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy A relevant question for the organization of large scale research assessments is whether bibliometric evaluation and informed peer review where reviewers know where the work was published, yield similar results. It would suggest, for instance, that less costly bibliometric evaluation might at least partly replace informed peer review, or that bibliometric evaluation could reliably monitor research in between assessment… CONTINUE READING