Bias in peer review

@article{Lee2013BiasIP,
  title={Bias in peer review},
  author={C. Lee and C. Sugimoto and G. Zhang and B. Cronin},
  journal={J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.},
  year={2013},
  volume={64},
  pages={2-17}
}
Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated… Expand
473 Citations
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
  • 14
Imperfect referees: Reducing the impact of multiple biases in peer review
  • 4
Cognitive Bias in the Peer Review Process: Understanding a Source of Friction between Reviewers and Researchers
  • 1
Bias in peer review: a case study.
  • 7
  • PDF
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
  • PDF
The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review
  • 10
  • PDF
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
  • 16
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
  • 100
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 217 REFERENCES
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
  • 221
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Experience with NIH Peer Review: Researchers' Cynicism and Desire for Change
  • 36
Editorial Judgments
  • 59
Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?
  • C. Sen
  • Medicine
  • Antioxidants & redox signaling
  • 2012
  • 11
  • Highly Influential
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
  • M. Mahoney
  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • 2005
  • 561
  • PDF
Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity
  • 27
  • PDF
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
  • 888
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices
  • 95
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...