Bias in Wikipedia

@article{Hube2017BiasIW,
  title={Bias in Wikipedia},
  author={C. Hube},
  journal={Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion},
  year={2017}
}
  • C. Hube
  • Published 2017
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
  • While studies have shown that Wikipedia articles exhibit quality that is comparable to conventional encyclopedias, research still proves that Wikipedia, overall, is prone to many different types of Neutral Point of View (NPOV) violations that are explicitly or implicitly caused by bias from its editors. Related work focuses on political, cultural and gender bias. We are developing an approach for detecting both explicit and implicit bias in Wikipedia articles and observing its evolution over… CONTINUE READING
    10 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Wikipedia citations: A comprehensive data set of citations with identifiers extracted from English Wikipedia
    • 3
    • PDF
    Approaches for Enriching and Improving Textual Knowledge Bases
    • PDF
    The Gendered Geography of Contributions to OpenStreetMap: Complexities in Self-Focus Bias
    • 6
    • PDF
    Uneven Coverage of Natural Disasters in Wikipedia: the Case of Flood
    • 3
    • PDF
    Analysis of category co-occurrence in Wikipedia networks
    • PDF
    The Gender Bias Tug-of-War in a Co-creation Community: Core-Periphery Tension on Wikipedia
    Co-destruction Patterns in Crowdsourcing
    • PDF
    Extracting and Learning Semantics from Social Web Data
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
    Collective Intelligence and Neutral Point of View: The Case of Wikipedia
    • 29
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia
    • 119
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Manipulation among the Arbiters of Collective Intelligence
    • 18
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Automated inference of point of view from user interactions in collective intelligence venues
    • 9
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter
    • 305
    • Highly Influential