Bias and the Bar

@article{Smelcer2011BiasAT,
  title={Bias and the Bar},
  author={S. Smelcer and Amy Steigerwalt and Richard L. Vining},
  journal={Political Research Quarterly},
  year={2011},
  volume={65},
  pages={827 - 840}
}
The vetting of potential federal judges by the Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary of the American Bar Association (ABA) is politically controversial. Conservatives allege the Standing Committee is biased against Republican nominees. The ABA and its defenders argue the ABA rates nominees objectively based on their qualifications. The authors investigate whether accusations of liberal bias have merit. They analyze all individuals nominated to the U.S. Courts of Appeals from 1977 to 2008… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Below the Bar? Racial and Gender Bias in Judicial Nominations
In this paper, I nd that minority and female nominees to federal courts are consistently awarded lower qualication ratings by the nation’s largest legal professional organization, the American BarExpand
How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates
  • M. Sen
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Law and Courts
  • 2014
This article uses two newly collected data sets to investigate the reliance by political actors on the external vetting of judicial candidates, in particular vetting conducted by the nation’s largestExpand
Strategic Bargaining on the United States Courts of Appeals
We employ never before used archival data to provide the first, systematic examination of the conditions under which federal circuit court judges craft legal opinions. Examining every private recordExpand
How Judicial Qualication Ratings Matter (and Why They Maybe Shouldn't)
This paper uses two new datasets to investigate the reliance by political actors on the external vetting of judicial candidates, in particular vetting conducted by the nation’s largest legalExpand
Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions
Abstract Unlike the massive literature about US Supreme Court confirmation battles, little has been written about lower federal court confirmation fights. However, in the past 20 years much has beenExpand
Judicial Ability and Securities Class Actions
We exploit a new data set of judicial rulings on motions in order to investigate the relationship between judicial ability and judicial outcomes. The data set consists of federal district judges’Expand
Do Attorney Surveys Measure Judicial Performance or Respondent Ideology? Evidence from Online Evaluations
  • T. Miles
  • Psychology
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
  • 2015
Which judges are “good” at their jobs, and which are not? The answer may depend on the ideology of whom you ask. Judicial decisions inevitably involve policy making, and lawyers may prefer judgesExpand
New Models of the Unilateral Presidency
OF DISSERTATION New Models of the Unilateral Presidency Though scholars have assessed the unilateral presidency with renewed interests, the literature remains weak in three important areas. WhatExpand
How Well do Measures of Ability Predict Judicial Performance?: A Case Study Using Securities Class Actions
Diverse measures are used as proxies for judicial ability, ranging from the college and law school a judge attended to the rate at which her decisions are cited by other judges. Yet, there has beenExpand
How Judicial Quali fi cation Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates
This article uses two newly collected data sets to investigate the reliance by political actors on the external vetting of judicial candidates, in particular vetting conducted by the nation’s largestExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
The Federalist Society's Influence on the Federal Judiciary
Only twenty-five years after its founding, the Federalist Society today boasts a nationwide membership including renowned attorneys, politicians, policy makers, and jurists. Although the SocietyExpand
To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977-1998
Using nominations to Article III district and appeals court judgeships, we test a model of senatorial treatment of presidential nominations to the lower federal bench, looking both at outcomeExpand
Role of Home State Senators in the Selection of Lower Federal Court Judges
This report examines the role played by Senators in the selection of nominees to two kinds of lower federal court judgeships. Specifically, the judgeships in question, over which Senators haveExpand
Examining the American Bar Association's Ratings of Nominees to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for Political Bias, 1989-2000
In this study, Professor Lindgren examined data on the 108 confirmed nominees to the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal from the administrations of George H.W. Bush and William J. Clinton. He shows - forExpand
Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process
  • J. Nash
  • Political Science
  • Perspectives on Politics
  • 2006
Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. By Nancy Scherer. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005. 288p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper. The lastExpand
Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas
The importance of lower federal courts in the policymaking process has stimulated extensive research programs focused on the process of selecting the judges of these courts and the factorsExpand
Appellate Judicial Appointments during the Clinton Presidency: An Inside Perspective
INTRODUCTION This essay provides an overview of the federal judicial nomination and confirmation processes from the perspective of a former Clinton administration attorney involved in the judicialExpand
Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan
A president's least-noticed important legacy is his appointment of judges to the lower federal bench. How are these judges chosen? What happens behind the scenes? How important are senators, partyExpand
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
We enter the debate over the role of sex in judging by addressing the two predominant empirical questions it raises: whether male and female judges decide cases distinctly (individual effects) andExpand
Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting
In this wide-ranging study, the authors use 200 years of congressional roll call voting as a framework for an interpretation of important episodes in American political and economic history. ByExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...