Bias and Reasoning: Haidt’s Theory of Moral Judgment

  title={Bias and Reasoning: Haidt’s Theory of Moral Judgment},
  author={S. Matthew Liao},
A topic of significant interest among social psychologists today is the extent to which intuitions, as opposed to reasoning, play a role in determining moral judgments (Haidt, 2001; Greene and Haidt, 2002; Pizarro and Bloom, 2003). Labeling the automatic, effortless, rapid process of intuitions as System 1, and the controlled, effortful, slow process of reasoning as System 2, a dominant perspective in developmental psychology — following the works of Piaget and Kohlberg — has been that our… 

How Imagined Interaction Conflict-Linkage Theory Complements Social Intuitionist Theory in Terms of Moral Judgments

Traditionally, research on moral reasoning has been based on the idea that moral judgments are based on reasoning and cognitive development. For example, Kohlberg's classic model of moral reasoning

Dimensions of Moral Intuitions – Metaethics, Epistemology and Moral Psychology

In everyday life we are permanently confronted with moral problems. But we are also faced with many difficulties and many different forms of how to come to a moral judgment. Modern moral psychology,

Individual Journalistic Bias Leads to Public Propaganda

The social intuitionist model (SIM) highlights the superiority of intuitive emotions over reasoning process in the link of moral judgment and reasoning, addressing the issues of private or individual

Teaching applied ethics to the righteous mind

What does current empirically informed moral psychology imply about the goals that can be realistically achieved in college-level applied ethics courses? This paper takes up this question from the

Psychology and the Aims of Normative Ethics

This chapter discusses the philosophical relevance of empirical research on moral cognition. It distinguishes three central aims of normative ethical theory: understanding the nature of moral agency,

‘First Listen to My Voice'

This chapter will consider dialogical models, especially those of Richard Paul and Mikhail Bakhtin, for teaching and learning of higher order thinking, which take into account these complex relations, and aims at optimizingHigher order thinking skills and dispositions, without neglecting human's emotional side and their need for authentic self-expression.

Deontology defended

This paper is a defense of deontological ethical theory and argues that Greene’s argument against deontology needs further support, saying that a rival sentimentalist view is at least as plausible given the empirical evidence and independently supported by philosophical theory.



Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it?

According to Haidt's (2001) social intuitionist model (SIM), an individual's moral judgment normally arises from automatic ‘moral intuitions’. Private moral reasoning—when it occurs—is biased and

The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001).

There is considerable evidence from outside the laboratory that people actively engage in reasoning when faced with real-world moral dilemmas, which limits the strong claims of the social intuitionist model concerning the irrelevance of conscious deliberation.

SIM and the City: Rationalism in Psychology and Philosophy and Haidt's Account of Moral Judgment

Jonathan Haidt (2001) advances the ‘Social Intuitionist’ account of moral judgment, which he presents as an alternative to rationalist accounts of moral judgment, hitherto dominant in psychology.

Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up?

The recent, influential Social Intuitionist Model of moral judgment (Haidt, Psychological Review 108, 814–834, 2001) proposes a primary role for fast, automatic and affectively charged moral

Haidt's Moral Intuitionist Theory: A Psychological and Philosophical Critique

Jon Haidt's (2001) proposal for a moral intutionist theory of morality is criticized on psychological and philosophical grounds, including (a) the apparent reduction of social influence to one kind,

Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology.

Here are two of the biggest questions in moral psychology: (1) Where do moral beliefs and motivations come from? (2) How does moral judgment work? All other questions are easy, or at least easier,

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

  • J. Haidt
  • Psychology
    Psychological review
  • 2001
The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached.

Moral dumbfounding: when intuition finds no reason

Are moral judgments based on reason, or on intuition and emotion? Thirty participants were presented with a classic moral reasoning dilemma, and with four tasks that were designed to put intuition

The cognitive science of morality : intuition and diversity

For much of the twentieth century, philosophy and science went their separate ways. In moral philosophy, fear of the so-called naturalistic fallacy kept moral philosophers from incorporating

Moral Intuitionism Meets Empirical Psychology

G. E. Moore’s diatribe against the naturalistic fallacy in 1903 set the stage for most of twentieth-century moral philosophy. The main protagonists over the next sixty years were intuitionists and