Beyond the Correlation Coefficient in Studies of Self-Assessment Accuracy: Commentary on Zell & Krizan (2014)

@article{Dunning2014BeyondTC,
  title={Beyond the Correlation Coefficient in Studies of Self-Assessment Accuracy: Commentary on Zell \& Krizan (2014)},
  author={David Dunning and Erik G. Helzer},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2014},
  volume={9},
  pages={126 - 130}
}
Zell and Krizan (2014, this issue) provide a comprehensive yet incomplete portrait of the factors influencing accurate self-assessment. This is no fault of their own. Much work on self-accuracy focuses on the correlation coefficient as the measure of accuracy, but it is not the only way self-accuracy can be measured. As such, its use can provide an incomplete and potentially misleading story. We urge researchers to explore measures of bias as well as correlation, because there are indirect… Expand

Figures and Topics from this paper

Social Perception of Self-Enhancement Bias and Error
Abstract. How do social observers perceive and judge individuals who self-enhance (vs. not)? Using a decision-theoretic framework, we distinguish between self-enhancement bias and error, where theExpand
(Mis)Understanding Our Influence Over Others
I review a burgeoning program of research examining people’s perceptions of their influence over others. This research demonstrates that people are overly pessimistic about their ability to getExpand
Reflections on Self-Reflection: Contemplating Flawed Self-Judgments in the Clinic, Classroom, and Office Cubicle
  • D. Dunning, C. Heath, J. Suls
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2018
TLDR
It is suggested that designing interventions aimed at improving self-judgment accuracy and error may prove to be a worthwhile but complex and nuanced task. Expand
A rational model of the Dunning-Kruger effect supports insensitivity to evidence in low performers.
TLDR
Comparing the predictions of two variants of the rational model provides support for low performers being less able to estimate whether they are correct in the domains of grammar and logical reasoning. Expand
Self-efficacy and performance relationships : examining the roles of personality, bias, and effort
The relationship between self-efficacy (a situation or task specific form of confidence) and performance has long been accepted as positive and reciprocal. However, recent challenges in theExpand
Miscalibration of self-efficacy and academic performance: Self-efficacy ≠ self-fulfilling prophecy
While it has been consistently demonstrated that academic self-efficacy and performance are positively correlated in groups of students, little is known about whether individual students' academicExpand
Is Overconfidence a Motivated Bias? Experimental Evidence
TLDR
The results suggest motivation’s effect on better-than-average BTA beliefs is driven more by idiosyncratic construals of assessment than by self-enhancing delusion, and suggest that by focusing on vague measures and vague traits, prior research may have exaggerated the role of motivation in overconfidence. Expand
Assessing self-assessment: can age and prior literacy attainment predict the accuracy of children’s self-assessments in literacy?
Self-assessment practices have been advocated in recent Irish educational documents due to their potential to enhance school children’s learning and self-regulatory skills. However, the literatureExpand
Self-Assessment and Self-Reflection to Measure and Improve Self-Regulated Learning in the Workplace
People's self-monitoring of their learning has extensive impact on generating opportunities for professional development. Self-monitoring before, during, and after completing work-related tasksExpand
On the impact of teaching experience on EFL instructors’ self-assessment of their instructional effectiveness
Teaching experience exerts a remarkable influence on instruction quality. The present study explores the role teaching experience plays in EFL university instructors’ self-assessment (SA) accuracyExpand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
TLDR
Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Expand
The Mixed Blessings of Self-Knowledge in Behavioral Prediction: Enhanced Discrimination but Exacerbated Bias
TLDR
It is demonstrated that self-knowledge provides a mixed blessing in behavioral prediction, depending on how accuracy is measured, and the broader implications of measuring judgmental accuracy of judgment in terms of bias versus discrimination are addressed. Expand
Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?
TLDR
Two final studies suggest this divergence in accuracy arises, in part, because people are unwilling to consult population base rates when predicting their own behavior but use this diagnostic information more readily when predicting others'. Expand
Do People Have Insight Into Their Abilities? A Metasynthesis
  • Ethan Zell, Z. Križan
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2014
TLDR
It is indicated that people have only moderate insight into their abilities but also underscore the contextual factors that enable accurate self-perception of ability. Expand
Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model.
  • S. Vazire
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 2010
TLDR
The self was the best judge of neuroticism- related traits, friends were the best judges of intellect-related traits, and people of all perspectives were equally good at judging extraversion-related trait judgments. Expand
Construal processes and trait ambiguity: implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment.
TLDR
The results suggest that people disagree in their judgments because they use idiosyncratic trait definitions when making judgments on ambiguous traits, and the cognitive and motivational forces that can influence the degree to which personality judgments differ. Expand
Assessing the Accuracy of Predictions about Dating Relationships: How and Why Do Lovers’ Predictions Differ from those Made by Observers?
In two longitudinal studies, university students, their roommates, and parents assessed the quality and forecast the longevity of the students’ dating relationships. The longitudinal nature of thisExpand
Others Sometimes Know Us Better Than We Know Ourselves
Most people believe that they know themselves better than anyone else knows them. However, a complete picture of what a person is like requires both the person’s own perspective and the perspectiveExpand
Why and when peer prediction is superior to self-prediction: the weight given to future aspiration versus past achievement.
TLDR
The authors tested whether this differential accuracy arises because people give more weight to past behavior when predicting others, but emphasize agentic information, in particular data about their aspiration level, when predicting the self. Expand
Considering the Situation: Why People are Better Social Psychologists than Self-psychologists
Are people better self- or social psychologists when they predict prosocial behavior? Why might people be more or less accurate when predicting their own and others' actions? In two studies,Expand
...
1
2
...