Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.

  title={Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.},
  author={Peter Glick and Susan T. Fiske and Antonio Mladinic and Jos{\'e} L. Saiz and Dominic Abrams and Barbara M. Masser and Babajide Samuel Adetoun and Johnston E. Osagie and Adebowale Akande and Ayodele J. Alao and Annetje Brunner and Tineke M. Willemsen and Kettie Chipeta and Beno{\^i}t Dardenne and Ap Dijksterhuis and Dani{\"e}l H. J. Wigboldus and Thomas Eckes and Iris Six-Materna and Francisca Exp{\'o}sito and Miguel Moya and Margaret Foddy and H J Kim and Mariana Lameiras and Mar{\'i}a Jos{\'e} Sotelo and Angelica Mucchi-Faina and Marzio Achille Romani and Nuray Sakallı and Bola Udegbe and Mizuka Yamamoto and Miyoko Ui and M. Cristina Ferreira and Wilson LOP{\'E}Z LOP{\'E}Z},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={79 5},
The authors argue that complementary hostile and benevolent components of sexism exist across cultures. Male dominance creates hostile sexism (HS), but men's dependence on women fosters benevolent sexism (BS)--subjectively positive attitudes that put women on a pedestal but reinforce their subordination. Research with 15,000 men and women in 19 nations showed that (a) HS and BS are coherent constructs that correlate positively across nations, but (b) HS predicts the ascription of negative and… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.

The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, first validated in U.S. samples, has been administered to over 15,000 men and women in 19 nations and shows that women, as compared with men, consistently reject hostile sexism but often endorse benevolent sexism.

Beyond Prejudice: An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality

The equation of prejudice with antipathy is challenged by recent research on sexism. Benevolent sexism (a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection and affection to women who

Benevolent Sexism, Attitudes Toward Motherhood, and Reproductive Rights

The results highlight the pernicious nature of BS by demonstrating that the idealization of women—and motherhood, in particular—comes at a substantial cost (namely, the restriction of women’s reproductive rights).

Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context

The theory of and research on ambivalent sexism — which encompasses both attitudes that are overtly negative (hostile sexism) and those that seem subjectively positive but are actually harmful

Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations.

The authors argue that hostile as well as benevolent attitudes toward men reflect and support gender inequality by characterizing men as being designed for dominance.

Education and Catholic Religiosity as Predictors of Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Toward Women and Men

The relationships of education and religiosity to hostile and benevolently sexist attitudes toward women and men, as assessed by the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI; Glick & Fiske, 1996) and the

Benevolent Sexism and Hostile Sexism Across the Ages

Ambivalent sexism theory states that prejudice toward women comprises two interrelated ideologies. Endorsement of hostile sexism—aggressive and competitive attitudes toward women—is linked with

Women's Benevolent Sexism as Reaction to Hostility

Grounded in the theory of ambivalent sexism, this study tested the speculation that women's benevolent sexist attitudes may be, in part, a self-protective response to environments they perceive as


The model of ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 1997) has claimed that sexist attitudes towards women include both benevolent and hostile sexism, due to the structure of the traditional



The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

The authors present a theory of sexism formulated as ambivalence toward women and validate a corresponding measure, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI). The ASI taps 2 positively correlated

Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices.

Prejudice and discrimination against women has become increasingly subtle and covert (N. V. Be-nokraitis & J. R. Feagin, 1986). Unlike research on racism, little research about prejudice and

The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women

Two studies using Peter Glick and Susan Fiske's Ambivalent Sexism Inventory examined sexist men's attitudes toward women. The authors hypothesized that ambivalent sexist (as compared with nonsexist)

The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations

This landmark study analyzes and compares the ideologies that develop among unequal social groups. Mary Jackman employs a unique national survey to investigate all three of the most prominent

(Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth

As Allport (1954) implied, the content of stereotypes may be systematic, and specifically, ambivalent. We hypothesize two clusters of outgroups, one perceived as incompetent but warm (resulting in

Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance?

Social dominance theory assumes transsituational and transcultural differences between men and women in social dominance orientation (SDO), with men showing higher levels of SDO than women. SDO is a

Wanting It Both Ways: Do Women Approve of Benevolent Sexism?

An oft-expressed criticism of feminism is thatwomen “want it both ways,” opposing whatGlick and Fiske (1996) have called “hostilesexism,” but accepting or approving of“benevolent sexism.” To examine

Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence

In contemporary research, attitudes toward women appear to be more positive than those toward men in samples of US and Canadian university students, and the evaluative content of the female

Neosexism: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est Pareil

A scale designed to tap into a new type of gender prejudice, called neosexist beliefs, is proposed. Two studies investigating antecedents and consequences of neosexism were conducted. In the first

Is Inequality Universal?

Ethnographic characterizations of pastoralists as egalitarian have recently been contested on the grounds that new studies have demonstrated a widespread inequality in livestock ownership, thus