Beyond consensus : reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science

  title={Beyond consensus : reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science},
  author={Jeroen P. van der Sluijs and Rinie van Est and M. Riphagen},
  journal={Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability},

Tables from this paper

Intergovernmental Expert Consensus in the Making: The Case of the Summary for Policy Makers of the IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report
This article investigates the practices through which consensus is reached on policy-relevant scientific conclusions in intergovernmental assessment bodies. Using the case of the Intergovernmental
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design
The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?
The release of emails from a server at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in November 2009 and the following climategate controversy have become a topic for interpretation in
Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC
This article explores the arguments for expanding deliberation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and scrutinizes their implications for the deliberative capacity of global
Learning the lessons of Climategate: A cosmopolitan moment in the public life of climate science
A decade after Climategate, climate change may be established as a social fact, yet the after‐effects live on. This Advanced Review assesses the impact of Climategate on public talk about climate
Democratizing global climate governance? The case of indigenous representation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Indigenous communities have a particular stake in climate and energy developments, and have come to occupy a central role in both the movement toward decarbonization of industrial societies and
A tangible point of reference : how to transform the obstructive public attitude towards climate change in the United States?
The scientific consensus on climate change is clear, but the social consensus in the United States has yet to concur. Mainstream explanations for the failure of the American public to engage the


Room for climate debate : perspectives on the interaction between climate politics, science and the media
The present study offers a picture of the complex interaction between climate politics, science and the media. During the 1970s and 1980s, politics and the sciences focused increasingly on the
Consensus About Climate Change?
The research result that a sample based on the keywords “global climate change” did not reveal any, suggesting that the existing scientific dissent has been greatly exaggerated and confirming that the statements and reports of leading scientific organizations—including the U.S. National Academy of Sciences—accurately reflect the evidence presented in the scientific literature.
Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC
It is argued that properly using the IPCC’s Guidance Notes for Lead Authors for addressing uncertainty, adding a pedigree analysis for key findings, and particularly communicating the diverse nature of uncertainty to the users of the assessment would increase the quality of the Assessment.
A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Foreword Abbreviations Part I. The Early History of the Climate Change Issue: 1. Nineteenth century discoveries 2. The natural carbon cycle and life on earth 3. Global research initiatives in
Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy
This paper adds a new dimension to the role of scientific knowledge in policy by emphasizing the multivalent character of scientific consensus. We show how the maintained consensus about the
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Fifty-two percent of Americans think most climate scientists agree that the Earth has been warming in recent years, and 47% think climate scientists agree (i.e., that there is a scientific consensus)
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Policy-makers and the public who are not members of the relevant research community have had to form opinions about the reality of global climate change on the basis of often conflicting descriptions
Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy
In this article, we argue that a major reason the United States failed to ratify the Kyoto Protocol to ameliorate global warming is the opposition of the American conservative movement, a key segment
Human choice and climate change
This is four-part work providing an international view of climate change which is designed to complement the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Second Assessment report. The complete work is a