Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit

@article{Brand2015BeyondAA,
  title={Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit},
  author={Amy Brand and Liz Allen and Micah Altman and Marjorie M. K. Hlava and Jo Scott},
  journal={Learned Publishing},
  year={2015},
  volume={28}
}
As the number of authors on scientific publications increases, ordered lists of author names are proving inadequate for the purposes of attribution and credit. A multi‐stakeholder group has produced a contributor role taxonomy for use in scientific publications. Identifying specific contributions to published research will lead to appropriate credit, fewer author disputes, and fewer disincentives to collaboration and the sharing of data and code. 
Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication
TLDR
It is recommended that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier. Expand
Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit
PurposeAuthorship is the ultimate status of intellectual recognition in academic publishing. Although fairly robust guidelines have already been in place for a considerable amount of time regardingExpand
How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship
TLDR
The paper recommended the use of a simple, but comprehensive, taxonomy that could be used by authors when submitting an article for publication to allow the range and nature of contributions to scholarly published output to be captured transparently and in a structured format. Expand
Authorship order and effects of changing bibliometrics practices
Although the authorship order on published research plays a significant role for scientific merit in many research contexts, and therefore should be handled with great care not least for the sake ofExpand
Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles
TLDR
The Contributor Attribution Model (CAM), which provides a simple data model that relates the contributor to research objects via the role that they played, as well as the provenance of the information, is introduced. Expand
Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication
TLDR
It is suggested that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and encourage authors to use the digital persistent identifier ORCID. Expand
Recognizing the Diversity of Contributions: A Case Study for Framing Attribution and Acknowledgement for Scientific Data
TLDR
The paper concludes by demonstrating that, analogous to acknowledging the different roles and responsibilities shown in movie credits, the methodology developed in the study could be used in general to identify and map out the relationships among the organizations and individuals who had contributed to a dataset. Expand
Quantifying authorship: A comparison of authorship rubrics from five disciplines
Transparency in authorship is a continuing topic in information science and scholarly communication. The process of determining authorship order in multi‐author publications, however, can beExpand
Copyright transfer in group-authored scientific publications
Academic publishers have different definitions of multiple authorship and ghost/guest authorship. When a scientific paper is submitted to a journal, the general assumption is that its ethics andExpand
Transparent Attribution of Contributions to Research: Aligning Guidelines to Real-Life Practices
TLDR
This article reviews key concepts of authorship and contributorship and examines the range of non-author contributions that may (or may not) be acknowledged, and proposes two new CRediT taxa and revisions to three existing taxa regarding both technical and editorial support to make credit attribution more transparent, accurate and open. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.
TLDR
The requirement that all participants be named as contributors will eliminate the artificial distinction between authors and acknowledgees and will enhance the integrity of publication. Expand
The Evolution of Data Citation: From Principles to Implementation
TLDR
The evolution of data citation standards and practices and core principles that have emerged through a collaborative synthesis are reviewed and the remaining implementation challenges are identified. Expand
Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers
Since 1946 biomedical writers have shown no marked trend toward multiple authorship; the average number of authors per paper remains steady at about 2.3. This is in strong contrast tothe conclusionExpand
Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?
  • E. Wager
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine
  • 2007
TLDR
Journals do not provide consistent guidance about authorship and many editors are therefore missing an important opportunity to educate potential contributors and to improve the accuracy, fairness, and transparency of author listing. Expand
Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines
TLDR
The lack of and variety of authorship definitions in journals and professional organizations across scientific disciplines may be confusing for the researchers and lead to poor authorship practices. Expand
A Descriptive Analysis of Authorship Within Medical Journals, 1995–2005
TLDR
A trend of increasing mean authors, editorial authorship, study groups, and multicenter trials over time with fewer solo authors now publishing original research or case reports is described. Expand
What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success
In this paper, we focus on the effects of surname initials on professional outcomes in the academic labor market for economists. We begin our analysis with data on faculty in all top 35 U.S.Expand
Credit where credit is due
TLDR
Introducing a new hobby for other people may inspire them to join with you, but many people are not interested in this hobby. Expand
Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers.
The Galaxy Zoo citizen science website invites anyone with an Internet connection to participate in research by classifying galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. As of April 2009, more thanExpand
2012
2012 marked the 25th anniversary of the Family Business Review (FBR). This milestone was celebrated with two special issues. The March issue carried articles that provided an overview of the fieldExpand
...
1
2
3
...