Beyond War and Peace: A Reappraisal of the Encounter between Christianity and Science

  title={Beyond War and Peace: A Reappraisal of the Encounter between Christianity and Science},
  author={David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers},
  journal={Church History},
  pages={338 - 354}
On a December evening in 1869, with memories of civil war still fresh in their minds, a large audience gathered in the great hall of Cooper Union in New York City to hear about another conflict, still taking its toll—“with battles fiercer, with sieges more persistent, with strategy more vigorous than in any of the comparatively petty warfares of Alexander, or Caesar, or Napoleon.” Although waged with pens rather than swords, and for minds rather than empires, this war, too had destroyed lives… 
The Life of Galileo
The late Ayatollah’s call for the assassination of Salman Rushdie was a graphic reminder of the cultural and historical nature of the concept of freedom of expression. Commentators described the
Andrew Dickson White played a pivotal role in constructing the image of a necessary, and even violent, confrontation between religion and science that persists to this day. Though scholars have long
Fundamentalism and Folk Science between the Wars
Reports of the demise of the "warfare" school of writing the history of religion and science may yet be premature,2 but it seems safe to say that it has had a near-death experience. Much recent
“Your God is Too Small”: Retracing the Origins of Conflict Between Science and Religion
ABSTRACT In this paper I reexamine the origins of John William Draper’s “conflict thesis.” I propose an alternative conclusion than what most historians of science have offered, one based on a
The War that Never Was: Exploding the Myth of the Historical Conflict Between Christianity and Science
Ask the average man or woman on the street and they will tell you that the war between science and religion is as old as sin. Anyone who has watched The Simpsons or has read Dan Brown’s best-selling
Gladstone, Religion, Politics and America: Perceptions in the Press, 1868 – 1900
This thesis examines American perceptions of William Ewart Gladstone in the religious and secular press from 1868 to 1900. The scope of the study encompasses his role as a Christian apologist and his
Science v. religion: Understanding historical confrontations (Galileo, Darwin, Scopes) to better solve current conflicts
Despite almost one hundred years of science advocacy, surveys show that many Americans are ignorant of basic scientific facts, skeptical of scientists, fearful of an increasingly scientific society,
The history of science has often been regarded as a series of conflicts between science and religion (usually Christianity), of which the cases of Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) and Charles Darwin
"The Claims of Religion Upon Medical Men": Protestant Christianity and Medicine in Nineteenth-Century America
This is the first study to examine how pastors lost authority over bodily healing in the nineteenth century. I argue that clergymen adapted to the scientific and cultural developments of the
The Protestant Enlightenment Revisited: Daniel Coit Gilman and the Academic Reforms of the Modern American University
  • D. Hart
  • Education
    The Journal of Ecclesiastical History
  • 1996
An exchange took place at the end of the nineteenth century between William Rainey Harper and Dwight L. Moody that makes little sense to those who study American intellectual life at the end of the


History or the conflict between religion and science
1. The origin of science 2. The origin of Christianity - its transformation on attaining Imperial power - its relations to Science 3. Conflict respecting the doctrine of the unity of God - the first
Demythologizing White's Warfare of Science with Theology.
O NCE UPON A TIME, in my course on the history of science and theology, I could conclude the chapter on Darwinsim with the Scopes Trial. Unfortunately, that can no longer be. The Creationists'
The Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion: A Professional Dimension
Was there a conflict between science and religion in late Victorian England? T. H. Huxley, Bishop Wilberforce, John Tyndall, Francis Galton, W. K. Clifford, and William Gladstone certainly thought
Galileo and the Council of Trent: The Galileo Affair Revisited
Very few episodes in the history of science have caused more discussion than the ecclesiastical condemnation of the Copernican system in 1616 and the ensuing personal persecution of Galileo in 1633.
God and nature : historical essays on the encounter between Christianity and science
Since the publication in 1896 of Andrew Dickson White's classic "History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom", no comprehensive history of the subject has appeared in the English
Wilberforce and Huxley: a Legendary Encounter
  • J. Lucas
  • History
    The Historical Journal
  • 1979
In this memorable encounter Huxley's simple scientific sincerity humbled the prelatical insolence and clerical obscurantism of Soapy Sam; the pretension of the Church to dictate to scientists the conclusions they were allowed to reach were decisively defeated.
The post-Darwinian controversies : a study of the Protestant struggle to come to terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870-1900
Preface Introduction: the terrain of revision Part I. Historians and Historiography: 1. Draper, White, and the military metaphor 2. Politics, polemics, and the military milieu 3. Warfare's toll in
Religion and Humanism
Religion without RevelationBy Dr. Julian Huxley. New and revised edition. Pp. xii + 252. (London: Max Parrish and Co., Ltd., 1957.) 21s. net.
The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century (Proceedings of a Symposium held at Oxford)Edited by A. R. Peacocke Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1981. 309 pp. $25.00
Luminaries such as Mary Hesse, Richard Swinburne and Eileen Barker give an interdisciplinary review of the debate between science and theology, covering topics like genetics, environmental problems
The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory
ONTEMPORARY ASSESSMENT of a new scientific theory will always \.depend upon how that theory is perceived. This may seem an obvious point, yet there exists an understandable tendency among some