Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals

@inproceedings{Pluhar1995BeyondPT,
  title={Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals},
  author={Evelyn B. Pluhar},
  year={1995}
}
In Beyond Prejudice , Evelyn B. Pluhar defends the view that any sentient conative being—one capable of caring about what happens to him or herself—is morally significant, a view that supports the moral status and rights of many nonhuman animals. Confronting traditional and contemporary philosophical arguments, she offers in clear and accessible fashion a thorough examination of theories of moral significance while decisively demonstrating the flaws in the arguments of those who would avoid… 

The agency account of moral status : defending the equal moral status of humans and non-human animals

In this thesis, I argue that humans and sentient animals have equal moral status in the sense that they ought to have like interests equally considered. Furthermore, they are owed strong pro tanto

Speciesism and Speciescentrism

The term ‘speciesism’ was once coined to name discrimination against nonhuman animals (Ryder 1975) as well as the bias that such discrimination expresses (Singer 2009 [1975]). It has sparked a debate

Social work, independent realities & the circle of moral considerability: Respect for humans, animals & the natural world

Social work's conceptualization as to what it is that entitles an individual or entity to moral consideration, or as having moral status, is thoroughly anthropocentric, and is articulated in complete

Taking Humanism Seriously: ``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism

Humanism – in the sense that humans alonehave moral standing, or else a surpassing degree of it– has traditionally dominated all of ethicaldiscourse. However, its past formulations havesuccumbed to

Egalitarianism and Animals

The moral consideration of nonhuman animals and the critique of speciesism have been defended by appeal to a variety of ethical theories. One of the main approaches in moral and political philosophy

Animal rights, political theory and the liberal tradition

Those scholars who have sought to argue for a higher moral status for animals, including the granting of rights to them, have come primarily from the liberal tradition. Their accounts are persuasive,

Expanding Global Justice: The Case for the International Protection of Animals

This article examines and rejects the view that nonhuman animals cannot be recipients of justice, and argues that the main reasons in favor of universal human rights and global justice also apply in

An Alternative to the Orthodoxy in Animal Ethics? Limits and Merits of the Wittgensteinian Critique of Moral Individualism

There is much of value in the Wittgensteinians’ call for an ethics that is more human; an Ethics that fully embraces the capacities the authors are endowed with and one that pays heed to the richness and complexity of their moral lives.

In Defence of Animal Sentience: A Critique of Cochrane's Liberty Thesis

In a recent article in Political Studies, Alasdair Cochrane argues that animals have an instrumental, but not – unlike humans – an intrinsic, interest in liberty. This, he argues, has important

Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and Animal Research

In the long history of moral theory, nonhuman animals—hereafter, just animals —have often been neglected entirely or have been relegated to some secondary status. 1 Since its emergence in the early
...