Between Science and Values

@article{Kitcher1981BetweenSA,
  title={Between Science and Values},
  author={Philip Kitcher and Loren Graham},
  journal={The Journal of Higher Education},
  year={1981},
  volume={54},
  pages={464-466}
}
Some people may be laughing when looking at you reading in your spare time. Some may be admired of you. And some may want be like you who have reading hobby. What about your own feel? Have you felt right? Reading is a need and a hobby at once. This condition is the on that will make you feel that you must read. If you know are looking for the book enPDFd between science and values as the choice of reading, you can find here. 
Is Natural Science Free from Morality
It has been frequently asserted that science is distinguished by its objectivity. Science, real science, deals only with what is, and has no concern with what ought to be. Science is antiseptically
Cosmogony and creation
It is convention, which is rarely broken in science, that references to First Causes should be omitted. Pragmatically, this convention enables agnostics, theists and atheists to work together in
Judgment and Reasoning in the Evaluation of Theories
  • M. Finocchiaro
  • Philosophy
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1986
In an attempt to clarify and strengthen the thesis that theory choice is a form of value judgment, I elaborate a central point advanced by Kuhn and McMullin and defend it from what appears to be a
On the development of beliefs vs
Introduction This article explores what an integral or second tier approach to belief-holding might entail. What do integralists believe and want others to believe? What relationship to belief (and
Philosophy as Worldview
A worldview is a comprehensive conception of all there is, whereas a philosophy is a scholarly discipline divided into special fields, every one of which is usually cultivated independently of the
Science and politics: Dangerous liaisons
SummaryIn contrast to the opinion of numerous authors (e.g. R. Rudner, P. Kitcher, L. R. Graham, M. Dummett, N. Chomsky, R. Lewontin, etc.) it is argued here that the formation of opinion in science
Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science
The North American confusion of science with technology can cloud epistemic views. This should be kept in mind as one reads the following analysis of students' views on the epistemology of science.
The Philosophical Matrix of Scientific Progress
The title of this chapter presupposes that there can be scientific progress. But half a century ago Thomas Kuhn famously attacked this assumption when he claimed that all past knowledge turned out to
The Proper Ends of Science: Philip Kitcher, Science, and the Good*
  • J. Simon
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 2006
In Science, Truth, and Democracy, Philip Kitcher challenges the view that science has a single, context‐independent, goal, and that the pursuit of this goal is essentially immune from moral critique.
The Rationalist Approach to Judgement-Making: Description and Critique
This chapter plays a heuristic role in our argument. In order to explicate practical reason, a detailed picture will be given of the misleading concept that features as practical reasoning in
...
...