Corpus ID: 173173278

Between Fairness and a Mistrial : Consensus Under a Deadline

@inproceedings{Bannikova2016BetweenFA,
  title={Between Fairness and a Mistrial : Consensus Under a Deadline},
  author={Marina Bannikova and Lihi Naamani-Dery and Svetlana Obraztsova and Jeffrey S. Rosenschein},
  year={2016}
}
Jury trial is, perhaps, the most prominent example of seeking a consensus. The process is particularly difficult if the judge places a deadline by which the jury must reach a unanimous decision, otherwise declaring a mistrial. A mistrial is commonly perceived to be worse than any decision the jury might render. As a result, while each juror has her own idea about the fairness of each possible trial outcome, she may eventually choose to vote for a less fair outcome, rather than cause a mistrial… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Between Discord and Deadlock: Consensus Under a Deadline
TLDR
This paper proposes a model for the above scenario - Consensus Under a Deadline (CUD)- based on a time-bounded iterative voting process, and provides convergence guarantees and an analysis of the quality of the final decision. Expand
Lie on the Fly: Strategic Voting in an Iterative Preference Elicitation Process
TLDR
This work provides a practical algorithm for strategic voters which computes the best manipulative vote and maximizes the voter’s selfish outcome when such a vote exists and provides a careful voting center which is aware of the possible manipulations and avoids manipulative queries when possible. Expand
Haste makes waste: a case to favour voting bots
TLDR
This paper examines how the deadline factor affects manipulative behavior in real-world scenarios were humans are required to reach a decision before a deadline and concludes that it might be wise to allow bots to make certain decisions on the authors' behalf. Expand
Alexithymia and reaching group consensus
TLDR
The results of the study confirm the link between alexithymia and impaired cognitive social alignment, showing that the alexityymia cognitive component (EOT) is associated with a deficit in reaching a consensus with humans (that sometimes act irrationally), however, this association was not evident when group members were bots (that always act rationally). Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Plurality Voting Under Uncertainty
TLDR
It is proved that a voting equilibrium exists even in the most general case, and any society voting in an iterative setting is guaranteed to converge to an equilibrium. Expand
Convergence to Equilibria in Plurality Voting
TLDR
This paper focuses on the Plurality voting rule, and studies the conditions under which this iterative game is guaranteed to converge to a Nash equilibrium, and shows for the first time how convergence depends on the exact attributes of the game, such as the tie-breaking scheme and on assumptions regarding agents' weights and strategies. Expand
Equilibria of Plurality Voting: Lazy and Truth-Biased Voters
We present a systematic study of Plurality elections with strategic voters who, in addition to having preferences over election winners, also have secondary preferences, governing their behavior whenExpand
How Bad Is Selfish Voting?
TLDR
Focusing on three common voting rules -- plurality, veto, and Borda -- this work provides very positive results for plurality and very negative results for Borda, and place veto in the middle of this spectrum. Expand
The Deadline Effect in Bargaining: Some Experimental Evidence
This paper reports the distribution of agreements over time in four bargaining experiments. There is a striking concentration of agreements reached in the very last seconds before the deadline. ThisExpand
Voter response to iterated poll information
TLDR
Under which circumstances sharing information via opinion polls can improve the quality of election outcomes and under which circumstances it may have negative effects, due to the increased opportunities for manipulation it provides are clarified. Expand
On the Convergence of Iterative Voting: How Restrictive Should Restricted Dynamics Be?
TLDR
This work provides two general conditions on the dynamics based on iterative myopic improvements, each of which is sufficient for convergence, and identifies several classes of voting rules, along with their corresponding iterative processes, for which at least one of these conditions hold. Expand
A local-dominance theory of voting equilibria
TLDR
Using extensive simulations of strategic voting, it is shown that emerging equilibria replicate widely known patterns of human voting behavior such as Duverger's law, and that they generally improve the quality of the winner compared to non-strategic voting. Expand
Determining Possible and Necessary Winners under Common Voting Rules Given Partial Orders
TLDR
It is proved that for Copeland, maximin, Bucklin, and ranked pairs, the possible winner problem is NP-complete; also, a sufficient condition on scoring rules is given for the possiblewinner problem to be NP- complete (Borda satisfies this condition). Expand
The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation
Abstract Two experiments explored actual and predicted outcomes in competitive dyadic negotiations under time pressure. Participants predicted that final deadlines would hurt their negotiationExpand
...
1
2
...