Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma

@article{Tilman2009BeneficialBF,
  title={Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma},
  author={David Tilman and Robert Harry Socolow and Jonathan A. Foley and Jason D. Hill and Eric David Larson and Lee R. Lynd and Stephen W. Pacala and John M Reilly and Timothy D. Searchinger and Chris Somerville and Robert Howard Williams},
  journal={Science},
  year={2009},
  volume={325},
  pages={270 - 271}
}
Exploiting multiple feedstocks, under new policies and accounting rules, to balance biofuel production, food security, and greenhouse-gas reduction. Recent analyses of the energy and greenhouse-gas performance of alternative biofuels have ignited a controversy that may be best resolved by applying two simple principles. In a world seeking solutions to its energy, environmental, and food challenges, society cannot afford to miss out on the global greenhouse-gas emission reductions and the local… 
View on AAAS
cedarcreek.umn.edu
1,542 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
46
Background Citations
556
Methods Citations
10
Results Citations
3

1,542 Citations

Food–feed–biofuel trilemma: Biotechnological innovation policy for sustainable development ☆

Biofuels Done Right: Land Efficient Animal Feeds Enable Large Environmental and Energy Benefits

There is an intense ongoing debate regarding the potential scale of biofuel production without creating adverse effects on food supply. We explore the possibility of three land-efficient technologies…

Biofuels done right: land efficient animal feeds enable large environmental and energy benefits.

This work explores the possibility of three land-efficient technologies for producing food, including leaf protein concentrates, pretreated forages, and double crops to increase the total amount of plant biomass available for biofuels.

Best practices for biofuels

Comments about biofuels in recent reports from Working Groups 2 and 3 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and a recent report by Liska et al. have a special weight in the public discourse.

Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard

Significance Biofuels are included in many proposed strategies to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and limit the magnitude of global warming. The US Renewable Fuel Standard is the…

The impact of biofuels on transport and the environment, and their connection with agricultural development in Europe

The use of biofuels in transport is being promoted as a means of tackling climate change, diversifying energy sources and securing energy supply. Biofuels production also provides new options for…

Sustainable Development of Algal Biofuels in the United States

Biofuels made from algae are gaining attention as a domestic source of renewable fuel. However, with current technologies, scaling up production of algal biofuels to meet even 5 percent of U.S.…

Biofuels technology development in Southern Africa

ABSTRACT The benefits of biofuels depend on the feedstock, conversion pathway and local context. This paper assesses biofuels technology readiness and developments to provide foresight to biofuels…

Biofuels: Efficiency, Ethics, and Limits to Human Appropriation of Ecosystem Services

Biofuels have lately been indicated as a promising source of cheap and sustainable energy. In this paper we argue that some important ethical and environmental issues have also to be addressed: (1)…

Sustainable Bioenergy Production, Land and Nitrogen Use

In recent years the challenge of reducing the reliance on petroleum and natural gas with the energy produced by agricultural crops has received a renewed interest. However, many scientists have…
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt

Converting rainforests, peatlands, savannas, or grasslands to produce food crop–based biofuels in Brazil, Southeast Asia, and the United States creates a “biofuel carbon debt” by releasing 17 to 420 times more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas reductions that these biofuel reductions would provide by displacing fossil fuels.

Second‐generation biofuels and local bioenergy systems

This study aims at identifying second‐generation biofuel feedstock, and provides information on the available technologies to produce second‐ generation biofuels, and discusses the development of local bioenergy systems vs sustainable use of second‐ Generation Biofuels.

Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass

Low-input high-diversity mixtures of native grassland perennials can provide more usable energy, greater greenhouse gas reductions, and less agrichemical pollution per hectare than can corn grain ethanol or soybean biodiesel.

Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities.

Protein feeds coproduction in biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals

Agriculture has changed greatly in the past in response to changing human needs. Now agriculture is being called on to provide raw materials for very large‐scale fuel and chemical production.…

Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline

A shift from gasoline to cellulosic ethanol has greater advantages than previously recognized, but these advantages are critically dependent on the source of land used to produce biomass for biofuels, on the magnitude of any indirect land use that may result, and on other as yet unmeasured environmental impacts ofBiofuels.

Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy

The implications of fully integrating terrestrial systems and the energy system into a comprehensive mitigation regime that limits atmospheric CO2 concentrations are explored, finding that this comprehensive approach lowers the cost of meeting environmental goals but also carries with it profound implications for agriculture: Unmanaged ecosystems and forests expand, and food crop and livestock prices rise.

Biofuel Plantations on Forested Lands: Double Jeopardy for Biodiversity and Climate

Reducing deforestation is likely to represent a more effective climate-change mitigation strategy than converting forest for biofuel production, and it may help nations meet their international commitments to reduce biodiversity loss.

Set-asides can be better climate investment than corn ethanol.

Based on a comprehensive analysis of 142 soil studies, soil C sequestered by setting aside former agricultural land was greater than the C credits generated by planting corn for ethanol on the same land for 40 years and had equal or greater economic net present value.