Bell on Bell's theorem: The changing face of nonlocality

  title={Bell on Bell's theorem: The changing face of nonlocality},
  author={Harvey R. Brown and Christopher G. Timpson},
  journal={arXiv: Quantum Physics},
Between 1964 and 1990, the notion of nonlocality in Bell's papers underwent a profound change as his nonlocality theorem gradually became detached from quantum mechanics, and referred to wider probabilistic theories involving correlations between separated beables. The proposition that standard quantum mechanics is itself nonlocal (more precisely, that it violates `local causality') became divorced from the Bell theorem per se from 1976 on, although this important point is widely overlooked in… 

Figures from this paper

Indeterminism and Undecidability
The aim of this paper is to argue that the (alleged) indeterminism of quantum mechanics, claimed by adherents of the Copenhagen interpretation since Born (1926), can be proved from Chaitin's
Does locality plus perfect correlation imply determinism
A 1964 paper by John Bell gave the first demonstration that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. There is an ongoing and vigorous debate on whether he relied on an
Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications
This short article concentrates on the conceptual aspects of the violation of Bell inequalities, and acts as a map to the 265 cited references. The article outlines (a) relevant characteristics of
Peaceful Coexistence: Examining Kent's Relativistic Solution to the Quantum Measurement Problem
Can there be `peaceful coexistence' between quantum theory and special relativity? Thirty years ago, Shimony hoped that isolating the culprit (i.e. the false assumption) in proofs of Bell
M ar 2 02 1 Indeterminism and Undecidability
The aim of this paper is to argue that the (alleged) indeterminism of quantum mechanics, claimed by adherents of the Copenhagen interpretation since Born (1926), can be proved from Chaitin’s
A Separable, Dynamically Local Ontological Model of Quantum Mechanics
This work finds that the resulting model violates local causality, but satisfies both separability and dynamical locality, making it a candidate for the ‘most local’ ontological model of quantum mechanics.
Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A new proof beyond Bell's theorem and a test of unitary quantum theories
It has been debated whether quantum mechanics and special relativity are incompatible and whether there is a preferred Lorentz frame if they are incompatible. Bell's theorem is an important
A No-Go Theorem for Observer-Independent Facts
A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts, which would be common both for Wigner and the friend is derived and is analyzed in the context of a newly-derived theorem arXiv:1604.07422, where Frauchiger and Renner prove that “single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent”.
The Unfinished Search for Wave-Particle and Classical-Quantum Harmony
The main purpose of this paper is to review the progress that has taken place so far in the search for a single unifying principle that harmonizes (i) the wave and particle natures of matter and


Quantum non-locality—it ainʼt necessarily so...
Bellʼs theorem is 50 years old. There still remains a controversy about its implications. Much of this controversy has its roots in confusion regarding the premises from which the theorem can be
Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory Reflections on Bell's Theorem
From the beginning, the implications of quantum theory for our most general understanding of the world have been a matter of intense debate. Einstein argues that the theory had to be regarded as
Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Probability
It is shown that the relational theory needs nothing more than the physical, minimal criterion of identity as defined by Everett's theory, and that this can be transparently interpreted in terms of the ordinary notion of the chance occurrence of an event, as witnessed in the present.
Causality, Bell's theorem, and Ontic Definiteness
Bell's theorem shows that the reasonable relativistic causal principle known as "local causality" is not compatible with the predictions of quantum mechanics. It is not possible maintain a satisfying
John S. Bell’s concept of local causality
John Stewart Bell’s famous theorem is widely regarded as one of the most important developments in the foundations of physics. Yet even as we approach the 50th anniversary of Bell’s discovery, its
The Two Bell ’ s Theorems of John Bell
Many of the heated arguments about the meaning of “Bell?s theorem” arise because this phrase can refer to two different theorems that John Bell proved, the first in 1964 and the second in 1976. His
Bell nonlocality
Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements
Does Quantum Nonlocality Exist? Bell's Theorem and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
Quantum nonlocality may be an artifact of the assumption that observers obey the laws of classical mechanics, while observed systems obey quantum mechanics. I show that, at least in the case of
Locality in the Everett Interpretation of Heisenberg-Picture Quantum Mechanics
Bell's theorem depends crucially on counterfactual reasoning, and is mistakenly interpreted as ruling out a local explanation for the correlations which can be observed between the results of
Individuality, supervenience and Bell's theorem
Some recent work in the philosophy of quantum mechanics has suggested that quantum systems can be thought of as non-separable and therefore non-individual, in some sense, in Bell and E.P.R. type