Bell Nonlocality

@inproceedings{Brunner2019BellN,
  title={Bell Nonlocality},
  author={Nicolas Brunner and Daniel Cavalcanti and Stefano Pironio and Valerio Scarani and Stephanie Wehner},
  year={2019}
}
Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements are not revealing pre-determined values, falsifying the idea of “local hidden variables” suggested by Einstein and others. One is then forced to make some radical choice: either nature is intrinsically statistical and individual events are unspeakable, or our familiar space-time cannot be the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Characterizing and witnessing multipartite correlations : from nonlocality to contextuality
In the past century, experimental discoveries have witnessed phenomena in Nature which challenge our everyday classical intuition. In order to explain these facts, quantum theory was developed, which
Mathematically Proving Bell Nonlocality Motivated by the GHZ Argument
TLDR
This paper aims to establish some mathematical methods for proving Bell nonlocality without inequalities, inspired by the work of the GHZ paradox, and derives some necessary conditions for a multipartite state to be Bell local in terms of “expectations” of local observables without invoking Bell inequalities.
Operational nonlocality.
An operational concept of locality whose quantum violation is indicated independently of any other assumption(s) seems to be lacking in the quantum foundations literature so far. Bell's theorem only
Macroscopic noncontextuality as a principle for almost-quantum correlations
Quantum mechanics allows only certain sets of experimental results (or "probabilistic models") for Bell-type quantum non-locality experiments. A derivation of this set from simple physical or
Relativistic independence bounds nonlocality
TLDR
It is proved that theories with nonlocal correlations stronger than the quantum ones do not satisfy this notion of locality, and therefore, they either violate the underlying generalized uncertainty relations or allow experimenters to nonlocally tamper with the uncertainty relations of their peers.
Exploring the Local Orthogonality Principle
Nonlocality is arguably one of the most fundamental and counterintuitive aspects of quantum theory. Nonlocal correlations could, however, be even more nonlocal than quantum theory allows, while still
Detecting nonlocality in many-body quantum states
TLDR
A simplified, experimentally accessible form of Bell inequalities is derived and can be tested by measuring total spin components, opening the way to the experimental detection of many-body nonlocality, for instance with atomic ensembles.
Bell nonlocality between sequential pairs of observers
Introduction.—Bell nonlocality, that is, the impossibility of simulating quantum mechanics with local hiddenvariable models [1–3], is one of the most fascinating predictions of quantum mechanics and
A model independent study of nonlocality with polarization entangled photons
Nonlocality as a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics is witnessed by violation of Bell inequality or its variants, for which all relevant studies assume some correlations exhibited by local
Colloquium : Bell’s theorem and locally mediated reformulations of quantum mechanics
In this critical review of Bell's Theorem, its implications for reformulations of quantum theory are considered. The assumptions of the theorem are set out explicitly, within a framework of
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem
TLDR
It is argued that Bell�s theorem (and its experimental confirmation) should lead us to relinquish not locality, but realism, and Methodological and statistical issues in the design of quantum Randi challenges (QRC) are discussed.
Quantum non-locality and relativity
It is sometimes stated that composite quantum systems in entangled states are fundamentally ‘non-local’(i.e. a measurement on one component system can affect a spacelike separated system
Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection
TLDR
Here, correlations in the classical properties of massive entangled particles (9Be+ ions): these correlations violate a form of Bell's inequality, and the high detection efficiency of the apparatus eliminates the so-called ‘detection’ loophole.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
TLDR
Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.
What Bell did
On the 50th anniversary of Bell’s monumental 1964 paper, there is still widespread misunderstanding about exactly what Bell proved. This misunderstanding derives in turn from a failure to appreciate
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
TLDR
The data imply statistically significant rejection of the local-realist null hypothesis and could be used for testing less-conventional theories, and for implementing device-independent quantum-secure communication and randomness certification.
Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars.
TLDR
In tests with polarization-entangled photons, measurement settings were chosen using real-time observations of Milky Way stars while simultaneously ensuring locality, pushing back by ∼600  years the most recent time by which any local-realist influences could have engineered the observed Bell violation.
"All versus nothing" inseparability for two observers.
TLDR
A recent proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities is formulated as a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-type proof involving just two observers, leading to a new state-independent proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem and provides a wider perspective on the relations between the major proofs of no hidden variables.
The two Bellʼs theorems of John Bell
Many of the heated arguments about the meaning of ‘Bellʼs theorem’ arise because this phrase can refer to two different theorems that John Bell proved, the first in 1964 and the second in 1976. His
Algorithmic Pseudorandomness in Quantum Setups.
TLDR
This Letter presents a new loophole for Bell-like experiments: if some of the parties choose their measurements pseudorandomly, then the computational resources of the local model have to be limited in order to have a proper observation of nonlocality.
...
...