Bayesian Models of Cognition Revisited: Setting Optimality Aside and Letting Data Drive Psychological Theory

  title={Bayesian Models of Cognition Revisited: Setting Optimality Aside and Letting Data Drive Psychological Theory},
  author={Sean Tauber and Daniel J. Navarro and Amy Perfors and Mark Steyvers},
  journal={Psychological Review},
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about the assumptions that underpin Bayesian models of cognition and what inferences they license about human cognition. In this paper we revisit this topic, arguing that there are 2 qualitatively different ways in which a Bayesian model could be constructed. The most common approach uses a Bayesian model as a normative standard upon which to license a claim about optimality. In the alternative approach, a descriptive Bayesian… 

How to Explain Behavior?

Three new frameworks for explanations that emerged after the cognitive revolution are distinguished, one of which describes mental processes in situations of uncertainty where an optimal solution is unknown and has considerable potential to inform each other and to generate points of integration.


Bayesian statistical methods provide a flexible and principled framework for relating cognitive models to behavioral data. They allow for cognitive models to be formalized, evaluated, and applied,

Bayesian Modelling of the Well-Made Surprise

A novel framework to model the audience's beliefs of a narrative world using approximate Bayesian inference over Markov Logic Networks and finds that for consistency and divergence, a change in the model’s pre- diction corresponds with a significantchange in the par-ticipants’ rating.

Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making

It is argued that verifying, rejecting, and expanding these explanations for suboptimal behavior – rather than assessing optimality per se – should be among the major goals of the science of perceptual decision making.

Believing in one’s power: a counterfactual heuristic for goal-directed control

This model closely mirrors people’s belief in their causal power –a belief that is well-suited to learning action-outcome associations in controllable environments and agrees with the intuitive way of construing causal power as “difference-making”.

Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty

Abstract According to Bayesian models of judgment, testimony from independent informants has more evidential value than dependent testimony. Three experiments investigated learners' sensitivity to

On the Irrationality of Being in Two Minds

A general framework that allows irrational decision making to be theoretically investigated and simulated is presented and it is found that bistable probabilities can be formalized by positive-operator-valued projections in quantum mechanics.

If mathematical psychology did not exist we would need to invent it: A case study in cumulative theoretical development

It is commonplace, when discussing the subject of psychological theory, to write articles from the assumption that psychology differs from physical sciences in that we have no psychological theories

Psychological Review Toward Nonprobabilistic Explanations of Learning and Decision-Making

Referring to probabilistic concepts (such as randomness, sampling, and probability distributions among others)is commonplacein contemporaryexplanationsof howpeoplelearnandmakedecisionsinthe faceof

What do our sampling assumptions affect: How we encode data or how we reason from it?

Across two experiments, it is found that the sampling cover story affects generalization when it is presented before the training stimuli, but not after, which is interpreted in favor of an encoding account.



Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition

It is argued that the expressive power of current Bayesian models must be developed in conjunction with mechanistic considerations to offer substantive explanations of cognition, and this unification will better facilitate lasting contributions to psychological theory, avoiding the pitfalls that have plagued previous theoretical movements.

Pinning down the theoretical commitments of Bayesian cognitive models

The target article calls for better differentiation of technical developments in probabilistic inference from theoretical contributions, and distinguishes between Bayesian Fundamentalism and Bayesian Enlightenment, which integrates rational and mechanistic considerations and is thus better positioned to advance psychological theory.

Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.

It is argued that many of the important constraints in Bayesian theories in psychology and neuroscience come from biological, evolutionary, and processing considerations that have no adaptive relevance to the problem per se.

Moving beyond qualitative evaluations of Bayesian models of cognition

A cross-validation analysis shows that the Bayesian memory model with inferred subjective priors predicts withheld data better than a Bayesian model where the priors are based on environmental statistics.

Using alien coins to test whether simple inference is Bayesian.

The current results highlight the importance of close quantitative comparisons between Bayesian inference and human data at the individual-subject level when evaluating models of cognition.

Bayesian data analysis.

  • J. Kruschke
  • Political Science
    Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
  • 2010
A fatal flaw of NHST is reviewed and some benefits of Bayesian data analysis are introduced and illustrative examples of multiple comparisons in Bayesian analysis of variance and Bayesian approaches to statistical power are presented.

Conditionalization and observation

I take bayesianism to be the doctrine which maintains that (i) a set of reasonable beliefs can be represented by a probability function defined over sentences or propositions, and that (ii)

Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models

  • M. Lee
  • Psychology, Computer Science
    Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • 2008
This article presents Bayesian analyses of three influential psychological models: multidimensional scaling models of stimulus representation, the generalized context model of category learning, and a signal detection theory model of decision making.

Leaping to Conclusions: Why Premise Relevance Affects Argument Strength

It is shown that a Bayesian model of category-based induction taking premise sampling assumptions and category similarity into account complements such theories and yields two important predictions: first, that sensitivity to premise relationships can be violated by inducing a weak sampling assumption; and second, that premise monotonicity should be restored as a result.