Bath's law, correlations and magnitude distributions

@article{Apostol2020BathsLC,
  title={Bath's law, correlations and magnitude distributions},
  author={Bogdan Felix Apostol},
  journal={arXiv: Geophysics},
  year={2020}
}
  • B. Apostol
  • Published 13 June 2020
  • Physics
  • arXiv: Geophysics
The empirical Bath's law is derived from the magnitude-difference statistical distribution of earthquake pairs. The pair distribution related to earthquake correlations is presented. The single-event distribution of dynamically correlated earthquakes is derived, by means of the geometric-growth model of energy accumulation in the focal region. The dynamical correlations may account, at least partially, for the roll-off effect in the Gutenberg-Richter distributions. The seismic activity which… Expand

Figures from this paper

Entropy of earthquakes: application to Vrancea earthquakes
The entropy of earthquakes is derived by using the Gutenberg–Richter statistical distributions. Both canonical and microcanonical earthquake distributions are given, and Einstein’s fluctuationExpand
Dependence of the source deactivation factor on the earthquake magnitude
Three fundamental laws of the physics of earthquakes, bearing the names of their discoverers Omori, Gutenberg, Richter and Bath, are widely used in original, review, monographic, and encyclopedicExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Båth's law and the self‐similarity of earthquakes
[1] We revisit the issue of the so-called Bath's law concerning the difference D1 between the magnitude of the main shock and the second largest shock in the same sequence. A mathematical formulationExpand
Self-similar earthquake triggering, Båth's law, and foreshock/aftershock magnitudes: Simulations, theory, and results for southern California
[1] Bath's law, the observation that the largest aftershock is, on average, 1.2 magnitudes smaller than its main shock, independent of main shock size, suggests some degree of self-similarity inExpand
Extreme value statistics and thermodynamics of earthquakes: aftershock sequences
The Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency law takes into account the minimum detectable magnitude, and treats aftershocks as if they were independent and identically distributed random events. A newExpand
Båth's law derived from the Gutenberg-Richter law and from aftershock properties
[1] The empirical Bath's law states that the average difference in magnitude between a mainshock and its largest aftershock is 1.2, regardless of the mainshock magnitude. Following Vere-Jones' [1969]Expand
Spatial distribution of the difference between the magnitudes of the main shock and the largest aftershock in the circum-Pacific belt
  • T. Tsapanos
  • Geology
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • 1990
The distribution of the magnitude difference D1 between the main shock and the largest aftershock for large circum-Pacific earthquakes is observed to be peaked at 1.2 magnitude units, in accordExpand
A Common Origin for Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Multiplets
We demonstrate that the statistics of earthquake data in the global Cen- troid Moment Tensor (CMT) and National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) catalogs and local California Council of theExpand
Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history
The fulfillment of a scaling law for earthquake recurrence–time distributions is a clear indication of the importance of correlations in the structure of seismicity. In order to characterize theseExpand
43 - Statistical Features of Seismicity
Seismicity studies are mostly statistical, because they deal with earthquake generation in groups. This chapter provides an overview of the studies related to statistical features of seismicity. TheExpand
Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress
TLDR
It is found that for short times after the mainshock, when low background seismicity rates allow for good aftershock detection, the decay is well fitted by a single inverse power law over distances of 0.2–50 km, which suggests that dynamic stresses may be triggering all of these aftershocks. Expand
Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras Fault, California
We present a technique that greatly improves the precision in measuring temporal variations of crustal velocities using an earthquake doublet, or pair of microearthquakes that have nearly identicalExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...