• DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007644.pub2
• Corpus ID: 40354443

Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.

@article{Dempsey2010BankedPV,
  title={Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.},
  author={Eugene M. Dempsey and Jan Miletin},
  journal={The Cochrane database of systematic reviews},
  year={2010},
  volume={6},
  pages={
          CD007644
        }
}

• E. Dempsey, J. Miletin
• Published 16 June 2010
• Medicine
• The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND
Human milk banking has been available in many countries for the last three decades. The milk provided from milk banking is predominantly term breast milk, but some milk banks provide preterm breast milk. There are a number of differences between donor term and donor preterm human milk.

OBJECTIVES
To determine the effect of banked preterm milk compared with banked term milk regarding growth and developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants (infants weighing less than 1500 g).

SEARCH STRATEGY
We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, including a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group specialized register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, January 2010). We searched the computerised bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (1988 to February 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to February 2010). We searched reference lists of all selected articles, review articles and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We also searched abstracts from neonatal and pediatric meetings (PAS electronic version from 2000 to 2009, ESPR hand search from 2000 to 2009). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing banked donor preterm milk with banked donor term milk regarding growth and developmental outcomes in very low birth weight infants

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We planned to perform assessment of methodology regarding blinding of randomisation, intervention and outcome measurements as well as completeness of follow-up. We planned to evaluate treatment effect using a fixed-effect model using relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. We planned an evaluation of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS
No studies met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There are no randomised trials that compare preterm banked milk to banked term milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.