• DOI:10.1080/21670811.2012.750150
• Corpus ID: 62882093

Balancing Between Open and Closed

@article{Aitamurto2013BalancingBO,
  title={Balancing Between Open and Closed},
  author={Tanja Aitamurto},
  journal={Digital Journalism},
  year={2013},
  volume={1},
  pages={229 - 251}
}

• Tanja Aitamurto
• Published 9 May 2013
• Business
• Digital Journalism

This study examines the impact of co-creation on magazine journalism by drawing on data from a structured, sequenced online co-creation process in an established consumer magazine. Co-creation is examined as a method for open journalism. Co-creation surprises and even shocks journalists, as they face the “real” reader, in intensive online reader engagement, instead of the imagined “ideal reader.” Journalists compromise quality, feature journalism to comply with readers’ wishes, thus breaking the reader contract and consistency in the magazine concept. Co-creation created a strong feeling of ownership over the magazine among readers; however, the end result was disappointment for both journalists and readers due to the failed content-integration process. Co-creation established a connection between the readers, which strengthened the magazines’ community-creator function. The findings indicate that co-creation is a more challenging method in journalism than crowdsourcing. This article contributes to the study of open journalism and the digital future of magazines.