Baker v. Carr and Legislative Apportionments: A Problem of Standards

@inproceedings{2019BakerVC,
  title={Baker v. Carr and Legislative Apportionments: A Problem of Standards},
  author={},
  year={2019}
}
  • Published 2019
  • Political Science

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES

Anderson, 125 Ky. 141, 100 S

  • 1907

concurring). Moreover, since the state legislature reapportlons congressional districts, there is little possibility that at large congressional elections would become a permanent institution

  • Thus
  • 1941

And frequently state courts then proceeded to hold the previous apportionment they had resurrected immune from constitutional attack

  • P. 2d
  • 1934

it arguably should also be able to reapportion. But cl. Silva, Ap. portionmentin New York, 30 FoDHAu L. Ray

    316. The leading pre-Baker commentator thought that the "performance of the state courts has been especially weak in fashioning remedies

      565 (1918) sufficiently state legislature. See Powell, Coercing a State to Pay a .tudgmncnt: Virginia v. West Virginia

      • MAicH. L. REV
      • 1918