Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility

Abstract

Two core meanings of “utility” are distinguished. “Decision utility” is the weight of an outcome in a decision. “Experienced utility” is hedonic quality, as in Bentham’s usage. Experienced utility can be reported in real time (instant utility), or in retrospective evaluations of past episodes (remembered utility). Psychological research has documented systematic errors in retrospective evaluations, which can induce a preference for dominated options. We propose a formal normative theory of the total experienced utility of temporally extended outcomes. Measuring the experienced utility of outcomes permits tests of utility maximization and opens other lines of empirical research.

Extracted Key Phrases

0204060'97'99'01'03'05'07'09'11'13'15'17
Citations per Year

543 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 543 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{KAHNEMAN1997BackTB, title={Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility}, author={DANIEL KAHNEMAN and PETER P. WAKKER and RAKESH SARIN}, year={1997} }