BI-RADS Density Classification From Areometric and Volumetric Automatic Breast Density Measurements.

  title={BI-RADS Density Classification From Areometric and Volumetric Automatic Breast Density Measurements.},
  author={Bj{\o}rn Helge {\O}ster{\aa}s and Anne Catrine Tr{\ae}gde Martinsen and Siri Helene Bertelsen Brandal and Khalid Chaudhry and Ellen B Eben and Unni Haakenaasen and Ragnhild S{\o}rum Falk and Per Skaane},
  journal={Academic radiology},
  volume={23 4},
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to classify breast density using areometric and volumetric automatic measurements to best match Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density scores, and determine which technique best agrees with BI-RADS. Second, this study aimed to provide a set of threshold values for areometric and volumetric density to estimate BI-RADS categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS We randomly selected 537 full-field digital mammography examinations from… Expand
Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Assessment using BI-RADS 5th edition revealed a higher proportion of dense breast than assessment using BI -RADS 4th edition, and automated volumetric density assessment had good correlation with visual assessment for both editions of BI- RADS. Expand
Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
Breast density measurements from both algorithms lead to equivalent BIRADS classification and MGD values, hence showing no difference in clinical outcomes. Expand
Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Digital breast tomosynthesis enabled the detection of more cancers in all density and age groups compared with digital mammography, especially cancers classified as spiculated masses and architectural distortions. Expand
An Open-Access Experimental Dataset for Breast Microwave Imaging
This work addresses the challenges of small sample sizes and a lack of experimental data by providing an open-source experimental dataset, obtained using a pre-clinical BMI system, and demonstrates the promise of machine learning methods for tumor-detection in BMI. Expand


Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists’ classification and their inter-observer variation
The optimal volumetric threshold of 10% using automatic assessment would classify breast parenchyma as fatty or dense with substantial accuracy and consistency compared to radiologists’ BI-RADS categorization, which suffers from high inter-observer variation. Expand
Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI–RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice
There is no clear difference between the visual assessments of density on 2D and 3D images, and use of the automated system requires the adoption of a cut-off value to effectively discriminate BI–RADS 1–2 and 3–4, and could be useful in clinical practice. Expand
A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.
Computer assessed breast density is absolutely reproducible, and thus to be preferred to visual classification, and the best fitting cut off value observed for QUANTRA was ≤22.0%, which correctly predicted 88.6% of D1-2, 89.8%" of D3-4, and 89.0% of total cases. Expand
Mammographic breast density: comparison of methods for quantitative evaluation.
Automated techniques for measuring breast density show good correlation, but these are poorly correlated with observer's scores, however automated techniques do give different results that should be considered when informing patient personalized imaging. Expand
Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.
Overall interobserver agreement in mammographic interpretation of breastdensity is substantial and therefore, the BI-RADS classification for breast density is useful for standardization in a multicentre study. Expand
Breast density: clinical implications and assessment methods.
Radiologists should understand the basic factors involved in breast density assessment, the changes related to density assessment described in the fifth edition of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, and the capabilities of currently available software. Expand
Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.
Categorization of breast density according to BI-RADS is feasible and consistency is good within readers and reasonable between readers, but interobserver inconsistency does occur, and checking the adoption of proper criteria through a proficiency test and appropriate training might be useful. Expand
Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density
  • M. Yaffe
  • Medicine
  • Breast Cancer Research
  • 2008
The techniques for measurement of density are reviewed and some consideration is given to their strengths and limitations. Expand
Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection.
An analysis of the effect that image selection can have on the performance of a breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system has proved that the automated lesion classification scheme is robust and can perform well when subjected to variations in user input. Expand
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis
This review explains some of the heterogeneity in associations of breast density with breast cancer risk and shows that, in well-conducted studies, this is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Expand