Axioms and Babylonian thought: a reply

@article{Dow2005AxiomsAB,
  title={Axioms and Babylonian thought: a reply},
  author={Sheila Dow},
  journal={Journal of Post Keynesian Economics},
  year={2005},
  volume={27},
  pages={385 - 391}
}
  • Sheila Dow
  • Published 1 April 2005
  • Philosophy
  • Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
Paul Davidson has criticized Babylonian thought as supporting an "anything goes" approach to Post Keynesian economics. This note explains Babylonian thought, not as the dual of classical logic but as another form of logic that is rigorous in light of the nonergodic nature of social systems, and the uncertainty this entails. It is argued that Babylonian thought is one way of understanding Keynes's "ordinary logic," while Davidson's use of the term "axiomatic" appears problematic. But the ergodic… 

Why Post Keynesianism Is Not Yet a Science

TLDR
The present – strictly formal – inquiry identifies an elementary logical flaw and strengthens the argument that the Post Keynesian motto ‘it is better to be roughly right than precisely wrong!’ is methodologically indefensible.

Rhetorical Dualism and the Orthodox/Heterdox Distinction in Economics

This paper attempts to combine elements of the approaches of two influential economists, Sheila Dow and Deirdre McCloskey and expands on previous work (2005) on Dow’s concept of dualism. A concept of

Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on what Post Keynesianism is and who is a Post Keynesian

  • P. Davidson
  • Economics
    Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
  • 2005
This paper responds to the criticism that many heterodox economists, who want to be labeled as Post Keynesians, are rejected by my defining Post Keynesian theory as limited to those theories that

Crisis and Methodology: Some Heterodox Misunderstandings

Whether justified by the concrete circumstances or not, an economic crisis is, by simple association, taken as an implicit refutation of the invisible hand vision and the underlying theory. The

Feminist and post-Keynesian economics: challenges and opportunities

There are significant areas of difference between feminist and post-Keynesian economics. Some feminist contributions to discussions about ontology and critical realism suggest strong reluctance to

Samuelson and Davidson on ergodicity: A reformulation

ABSTRACT The concept of ergodicity in economics seems to have the qualities of a shibboleth—a word or saying used by adherents of a party, sect, or belief, and usually regarded by others as empty of

Sen's capability approach and Post Keynesianism: similarities, distinctions, and the Cambridge tradition

The capability approach to human development, proposed by Amartya Sen and others, is now a prominent perspective within welfare economics and development economics. I argue that the capability

The Rhetoric of Failure: A Hyper-Dialog About Method in Economics and How to Get Things Going

All are agreed that orthodox economics is unsatisfactory but there is wide disagreement, especially among heterodox critics, whether the problems lie at the level of substantive theory or at the

Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics

Pluralism is a key term in the current discourse in heterodox economics, emphasizing the need for greater theoretical integration and institutional cooperation of different economic traditions.

Ethics and Finance: the role of mathematics

This paper presents the contemporary Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing as being equivalent to approaches to pricing that emerged before 1700 in the context of Virtue Ethics. This is done by

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 13 REFERENCES

Reviving Keynes’s Revolution

Addressing The General Theory chiefly to his ‘fellow economists’ (1936, p. v), Keynes insisted that the postulates of the classical theory are applicable to a special case only and not to the

Economics and Reality

'No reality please. We're economists'. There is a wide spread belief that modern economics is irrelevant to the understanding of the real world. In a controversial and original study, Tony Lawson

THE GENERAL THEORY OF EMPLOYMENT, INTEREST AND MONEY

It has become traditional for reviewers of important books to begin by saying that it is impossible within the limits of a single article to do more than consider very briefly a few of the questions

Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-Making Processes

Proponents of the rational expectations hypothesis (hereafter REH) claim they have developed a general theory of how expectations are formed. To assure that these rational expectations generate

Prospects for the Progress of Heterodox Economics

  • Sheila Dow
  • Economics
    Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • 2000
What are the prospects for progress in heterodox economics? The question posed for this roundtable discussion raises a wide range of important issues, for heterodox economics and for economics as a

Post Keynesian Economics and Its Critics

Structured pluralism

The purpose of this paper is to consider how far the notion of schools of thought is compatible with methodological pluralism. Should economics instead be categorised simply as pluralist or

Taxonomy, Communication, and Rhetorical Strategy

Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism: What Is the Connection?

On the coherence of Post-Keynesian Economics

Recently the claim that post-Keynesianism represents a coherent alternative to orthodox/neoclassical theory has regained favor with many leading post-Keynesians. The purpose of this paper is to