Averting Nuclear Catastrophe: Contemplating Extreme Responses to U.S. Vulnerability

  title={Averting Nuclear Catastrophe: Contemplating Extreme Responses to U.S. Vulnerability},
  author={R. Gallucci},
  journal={The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  pages={51 - 58}
  • R. Gallucci
  • Published 2005
  • Business, Sociology
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Traditional deterrence is not an effective approach toward terrorist groups bent on causing a nuclear catastrophe. Preventive strategies, which call for the elimination of an enemy before it is able to attack, are highly risky and often difficult to implement. The United States should instead consider a policy of expanded deterrence, which focuses not on the would-be nuclear terrorists but on those states that may deliberately transfer or inadvertently leak nuclear weapons and materials to them… Expand
Recalibrating Deterrence to Prevent Nuclear Terrorism
In a 2010 interview with The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward, thenPresident Barack Obama judged the United States generally resilient to terrorist attack, but qualified that “a potential game changerExpand
Deterrence of nuclear terrorism via post-detonation attribution is the United States on target?
Abstract : As nuclear terrorism has a risk of low probability and high consequences, the United States is right to address it as a significant -- but not the utmost -- national security priority. TheExpand
Considering Alternative Nuclear Targeting Strategies
We construct an analysis framework for nuclear force structure where the ends are deterrence objectives, the ways are viable targeting strategies, and the means are nuclear forces. DeterringExpand
To What Extent is Nuclear Deterrence Important in the Post-Cold War World?
The end of the Cold War led to a sudden change in the security agenda of Western policymakers. In this context, the debate over the function of nuclear weapons in the new security scenario played aExpand
Deterring a Nuclear 9/11
Can a nuclear terrorist attack be deterred? Nuclear forensic techniques to identify the origins of nuclear materials are improving, but significant associated strategic, political, diplomatic, andExpand
Recently, post-explosion nuclear forensics, or nuclear attribution, has gained a new spotlight within the nuclear weapons scientific and policymaking community. Academics are beginning to ask whetherExpand
The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research
Following the end of the Cold War and accelerating after 9/11, a new wave of research on deterrence has emerged. Building on an earlier characterization by Robert Jervis, this work is here designatedExpand
Repetitive Patterns of the Crisis
The second North Korean nuclear crisis cannot be separated from the first crisis, not only because of the conflict between North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear capability and an international demand forExpand
Bayesian network analysis of nuclear acquisitions
Bayesian Network Analysis of Nuclear Acquisitions. (August 2008) Corey Ross Freeman, B.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. William S. Charlton Nuclear weapons proliferationExpand
Facing disaster: the great challenges framework
This paper provides a detailed survey of the greatest dangers facing humanity this century. It argues that there are three broad classes of risks – the “Great Challenges” – that deserve our immediateExpand


Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe
A call to action on the threat of nuclear terrorism predicts that a catastrophic attack is likely to occur within the next decade if policy makers continue present tactics, and states that such anExpand
Deterrence of Nuclear Terror
Nuclear proliferation, lax security standards in the storage of fissile materials, and international apathy in the prosecution of terrorists make nuclear terror a serious threat to the United StatesExpand